Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54759.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.54759. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Ethical Concerns About ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Useful Tool or the Tombstone of Original and Reflective Thinking?

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Concerns About ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Useful Tool or the Tombstone of Original and Reflective Thinking?

Marina Z Kapsali et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), the uprising technology of computer science aiming to create digital systems with human behavior and intelligence, seems to have invaded almost every field of modern life. Launched in November 2022, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a textual AI application capable of creating human-like responses characterized by original language and high coherence. Although AI-based language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in healthcare, ChatGPT has received controversial annotations from the scientific and academic communities. This chatbot already appears to have a massive impact as an educational tool for healthcare professionals and transformative potential for clinical practice and could lead to dramatic changes in scientific research. Nevertheless, rational concerns were raised regarding whether the pre-trained, AI-generated text would be a menace not only for original thinking and new scientific ideas but also for academic and research integrity, as it gets more and more difficult to distinguish its AI origin due to the coherence and fluency of the produced text. This short review aims to summarize the potential applications and the consequential implications of ChatGPT in the three critical pillars of medicine: education, research, and clinical practice. In addition, this paper discusses whether the current use of this chatbot is in compliance with the ethical principles for the safe use of AI in healthcare, as determined by the World Health Organization. Finally, this review highlights the need for an updated ethical framework and the increased vigilance of healthcare stakeholders to harvest the potential benefits and limit the imminent dangers of this new innovative technology.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; chatgpt; education; ethical framework; healthcare research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of ChatGPT features and their possible positive or negative effects on certain key ethical principles for the use of AI in healthcare.
The potential positive and negative impacts of ChatGPT on crucial ethical principles [3] governing AI utilization in healthcare. This figure is an original work of the authors.

References

    1. Ai-based modeling: techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems. Sarker IH. SN Comput Sci. 2022;3:158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Choi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF, Campbell JP. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lekadir K, Quaglio G, Garmendia AT, Gallin C. Artificial intelligence in healthcare-applications, risks, and ethical and societal impacts. European Parliament; 2022. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare-Applications, Risks, and Ethical and Societal Impacts.
    1. World Health Organization (2021): Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
    1. How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper) Mertz M. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:81. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources