Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Mar 8:12:1246897.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1246897. eCollection 2024.

Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity

Elizabeth A Dodson et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence-based policies are a powerful tool for impacting health and addressing obesity. Effectively communicating evidence to policymakers is critical to ensure evidence is incorporated into policies. While all public health is local, limited knowledge exists regarding effective approaches for improving local policymakers' uptake of evidence-based policies.

Methods: Local policymakers were randomized to view one of four versions of a policy brief (usual care, narrative, risk-framing, and narrative/risk-framing combination). They then answered a brief survey including questions about their impressions of the brief, their likelihood of using it, and how they determine legislative priorities.

Results: Responses from 331 participants indicated that a majority rated local data (92%), constituent needs/opinions (92%), and cost-effectiveness data (89%) as important or very important in determining what issues they work on. The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that briefs were understandable (87%), believable (77%), and held their attention (74%) with no brief version rated significantly higher than the others. Across the four types of briefs, 42% indicated they were likely to use the brief. Logistic regression models showed that those indicating that local data were important in determining what they work on were over seven times more likely to use the policy brief than those indicating that local data were less important in determining what they work on (aOR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.86,52.57).

Discussion: Among local policymakers in this study there was no dominant format or type of policy brief; all brief types were rated similarly highly. This highlights the importance of carefully crafting clear, succinct, credible, and understandable policy briefs, using different formats depending on communication objectives. Participants indicated a strong preference for receiving materials incorporating local data. To ensure maximum effect, every effort should be made to include data relevant to a policymaker's local area in policy communications.

Keywords: communication; dissemination; evidence-based policy; local policy; obesity policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NL was employed by CivicPulse. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer CW declared a past collaboration with the author RB to the handling editor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Overweight & Obesity. Why it Matters. (2022). Available online at: https://wwwcdcgov/obesity/about-obesity/why-it-mattershtml#:~:text=Obesi... (accessed May 20, 2023).
    1. Brownson RC, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride TD. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. (2006) 30:164–72. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Dodson EA, Stamatakis KA, Casey CM, Elliott MB, Luke DA, et al. . Communicating evidence-based information on cancer prevention to state-level policy makers. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2011) 103:306–16. 10.1093/jnci/djq529 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Ten great public health achievements–United States, 1900-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (1999) 48:241–3. - PubMed
    1. Pollack Porter KM, Rutkow L, McGinty EE. The importance of policy change for addressing public health problems. Public Health Rep. (2018) 133:9S−14S. 10.1177/0033354918788880 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources