Initial Experience and Clinical Assessment of the Karl Storz FLEX-XC1 Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope
- PMID: 38526412
- DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000552
Initial Experience and Clinical Assessment of the Karl Storz FLEX-XC1 Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope
Abstract
Introduction: The Karl Storz FLEX-XC1 is a novel single-use flexible ureteroscope that uses the same videographics platform as its reusable digital counterpart. We evaluated the technical performance of the FLEX-XC1 in its initial clinical use.
Methods: We reviewed a series of consecutive ureteroscopy procedures performed by 2 endourologists using the FLEX-XC1 for indications for which we typically use a single-use device: total stone burden > 15 mm or > 10 mm in the lower pole, anticipated case duration > 60 minutes, bilateral procedure, or upper tract urothelial cancer procedures. We assessed device tip deflection, intraoperative mechanical failure, and clinical outcomes for each case. Surgeons rated visual clarity, image quality, and maneuverability on a 1 to 5 Likert scale.
Results: Of 29 procedures using FLEX-XC1, 27 (93%) were successfully completed. Preoperative upward deflection was < 270° in 6 (21%) cases, and downward deflection was < 270° in 9 (31%) cases. Three types of intraoperative malfunctions occurred: rotational twisting of deflectable tip (4 cases, 13%), device not advancing through distal ureter (1 case, 3%), and working channel not accommodating a 365-μm laser (1 case, 3%). Visual clarity, image quality, and maneuverability were rated as 5 "very good" or 4 "good" in 100%, 100%, and 97% of cases, respectively. No device-specific or general 30-day complications were observed.
Conclusions: The FLEX-XC1 showed comparable image quality and maneuverability to reusable digital devices. We observed incomplete deflection in up to 31% of cases and mechanical failure in 2 cases. The FLEX-XC1 may be advantageous in prolonged cases where maintaining visual clarity is paramount.
Keywords: FLEX-XC1; single-use ureteroscope; technology; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis.
Comment in
-
Editorial Commentary.Urol Pract. 2024 May;11(3):469. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000545. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Urol Pract. 2024. PMID: 38526418 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A prospective survey evaluating the visual quality of KARL STORZ fiberoptic, digital, and disposable flexible ureteroscopes.World J Urol. 2025 Feb 12;43(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05502-x. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 39937281 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Jun;19(3):248.e1-248.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 19. J Pediatr Urol. 2023. PMID: 36746718
-
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):903-907. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. Epub 2017 Mar 2. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 27981862
-
Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2325-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02675-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30770944 Review.
-
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):456-467. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0475. Int Braz J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34786927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Intraoperative Digital Stone Measurement on Surgeon Decision Making in Ureteroscopy.Urology. 2025 Jun 27:S0090-4295(25)00643-0. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.064. Online ahead of print. Urology. 2025. PMID: 40582579
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources