Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May;48(5):1045-1055.
doi: 10.1002/wjs.12140. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Lifecycle of surgical devices: Global, environmental, and regulatory considerations

Eric R Wahlstedt  1 , John C Wahlstedt  2 , Jenna S Rosenberg  3 , Catherine R deVries  3
Affiliations
Review

Lifecycle of surgical devices: Global, environmental, and regulatory considerations

Eric R Wahlstedt et al. World J Surg. 2024 May.

Abstract

Background: Technological advancements, improved surgical access, and heightened demand for surgery have fueled unprecedented device and supply turnover impelling wealthy hospitals to upgrade continually and sell, donate, recycle, or dispose of used, expired, antiquated, or surplus goods. This paper reviews the issues related to device and supply lifecycles and discusses the opportunities and challenges they present for sustainable surgical growth in low- and middle-income (LMICs) countries.

Observations: This review found, in LMICs countries, regulatory disparities persist that limit effective harmonization secondary to highly variable national policies and a lack of prioritized enforcement. Heterogeneity in the regulatory landscape, specifically in the classification, nomenclature, and identification of medical devices, encumbers effective regulation and distribution. Once devices are sold, donated, or reused in LMICs countries, complexities arise in regulatory compliance, maintenance, and appropriate use of these technologies. At the end of the lifecycle, waste management poses significant obstacles with limited resources hindering the implementation of best practices.

Conclusion: There are major disparities in access to quality surgical equipment and supplies around the world. Improved communication between relevant stakeholders and harmonization of manufacture and disposal regulations will be needed to ensure adequate and appropriate responses to these challenges.

Trial registration number: Not applicable.

Keywords: devices; environmental; global; lifecycle; regulations; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Dobson, Geoffrey P. 2020. “Trauma of Major Surgery: A Global Problem that Is Not Going Away.” International Journal of Surgery 81: 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.017.
    1. Etzioni, David A., Jerome H. Liu, Melinda A. Maggard, and Clifford Y. Ko. 2003. “The Aging Population and its Impact on the Surgery Workforce.” Annals of Surgery 238(2): 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000081085.98792.3d.
    1. Liu, Jerome H., David A. Etzioni, Jessica B. O'Connell, Melinda A. Maggard, and Clifford Y. Ko. 2004. “The Increasing Workload of General Surgery.” Archives of Surgery 139(4): 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.423.
    1. Meara, John G., Andrew J. M. Leather, Lars Hagander, Blake C. Alkire, Nivaldo Alonso, Emmanuel A. Ameh, Stephen W. Bickler, et al. 2015. “Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and Solutions for Achieving Health, Welfare, and Economic Development.” The Lancet 386(9993): 569–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140‐6736(15)60160‐X
    1. Precedence Research. 2023. Surgical Equipment Market (By Product: Surgical Sutures & Staplers, Handheld Surgical Device, and Electrosurgical Devices; Application: Neurosurgery, Wound Care, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cardiovascular, Orthopedic, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, and Others)—Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, Regional Outlook, and Forecast 2023–2032. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/surgical‐equipment‐market. accessed 11.14.2023.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources