Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243786.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3786.

Accuracy of Diagnosing Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Affiliations

Accuracy of Diagnosing Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Emil List Larsen et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent diagnostic clarification. However, knowledge of the diagnostic utility of the recommended diagnostic tests is limited in clinical practice.

Objective: To evaluate the current diagnostic practice for managing the suspicion of HIT.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective diagnostic study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2021 among consecutive patients with suspected HIT from 11 study centers in Switzerland, Germany, and the United States. Detailed clinical data and laboratory information were recorded. Platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies were quantified using an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). A washed-platelet heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test was used as a reference standard to define HIT.

Exposures: Suspicion of HIT.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the 4Ts score, the CLIA, and the recommended algorithm serially combining both tests.

Results: Of 1448 patients included between 2018 and 2021, 1318 were available for the current analysis (median [IQR] age, 67 [57-75] years; 849 [64.6%] male). HIPA was positive in 111 patients (prevalence, 8.4%). The most frequent setting was intensive care unit (487 [37.0%]) or cardiovascular surgery (434 [33.0%]). The 4Ts score was low risk in 625 patients (46.8%). By 2 × 2 table, the numbers of patients with false-negative results were 10 (9.0%; 4Ts score), 5 (4.5%; CLIA), and 15 (13.5%; recommended diagnostic algorithm). The numbers of patients with false-positive results were 592 (49.0%; 4Ts score), 73 (6.0%; CLIA), and 50 (4.1%; recommended diagnostic algorithm), respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: In this diagnostic study of patients suspected of having HIT, when the recommended diagnostic algorithm was used in clinical practice, antibody testing was required in half the patients. A substantial number of patients were, however, still misclassified, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or overtreatment. Development of improved diagnostic algorithms for HIT diagnosis should be pursued.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Greinacher reported receiving personal fees from Aspen, Bayer Vital, Instrumentation Laboratory, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, GTH, Dilaflor, Takeda, Falk Foundation, Mylan Germany, Werfen, and Chromatee; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Rovi, Sagent, Portola, Biokit, Blau Faraceutics, Prosensa/Biomarin, DRK-BSD Baden-Würtemberg/Hessen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Robert-Koch-Institut, GIZ Else-Körner-Stiftung, and European Medicines Agency; grants and personal fees from Macoharma; grants and other from DRK-BSD NSTOB; and nonfinancial support from Veralox, Vakzine Projekt Management, AstraZeneca, and Janssen Vaccines & Prevention outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Greinacher has a patent for screening methods for transfusion-related acute lung injury and a patent for universal plasm as well as a patent for PF4 antibodies pending. Dr Mendez reported receiving personal fees from Silamed and Sysmex outside the submitted work. Dr Gerber reported receiving grants to the institution and continued medical education support from Pfizer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Axonlab and receiving continued medical education support from Sanofi, Alnylam, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Octapharma, Takeda, SOBI, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Mitsubishi Taneba outside of the current work. Dr Kremer Hovinga reported receiving grants and personal fees paid to the employer from Takeda; grants to the employer from SNSF, Bayer, Octapharma, FOPH, the Swiss Hemophilia Society, Roche, SOBI, NovoNordisk, and CSL-Behring; personal fees paid to the employer from Sanofi/Ablynx; and travel support from SOBI outside the submitted work. Dr Bakchoul reported receiving grants from Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft, Stiftung Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhämatologie, DRK Blutspendedienst, Deutsche Herzstiftung, Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden Würtemberg, and Gesellschaft für Thrombose- und Hämostaseforschung; receiving lecture fees from Berufsverband Deutscher Internisten, CoaChrom Diagnostica, Robert Bosch, Ergomed, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Doctrina Med, Leo Pharma, Schöchl Medical Education, Meet the Expert, Biotest, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novo Nordisk, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrium; having a patent for screening methods pending from atent; and grant support, consultancy fees, honoraria, or support for attending meetings from Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft, Stiftung Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhämatologie, DRK Blutspendedienst, Deutsche Herzstiftung, Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden Würtemberg, Gesellschaft für Thrombose- und Hämostaseforschung outside the submitted work. Dr Nagler reported receiving grants from Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, Stago, and Bühlmann Laboratories as well as lecture fees from Sysmex, Siemens Healthineers, Abbott, COR2ED, Werfen, Viatris, Silamed, Novartis, and Euroimmun outside of the current work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves
Receiver operating characteristic curve of 4Ts score (A) and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA; B) as with 95% CIs (shaded area). Diagnostic thresholds with 95% CIs are marked. AUC indicates area under the curve.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Diagnostic Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Clinical Practice
Proportion of true-negative (dark orange), false-negative (light orange), true-positive (blue), and false-positive (gray) results are given using the 4Ts score (A), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA; B), and the recommended diagnostic algorithm (C). Created with Biorender.com.

References

    1. Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Am J Med. 1996;101(5):502-507. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00258-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nand S, Wong W, Yuen B, Yetter A, Schmulbach E, Gross Fisher S. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis: incidence, analysis of risk factors, and clinical outcomes in 108 consecutive patients treated at a single institution. Am J Hematol. 1997;56(1):12-16. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199709)56:1<12::AID-AJH3>3.0.CO;2-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gruel y, Vayne c, Rollin j, et al. . comparative analysis of a French prospective series of 144 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (FRIGTIH) and the literature. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(7):1096-1107. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1712957 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-associated thrombosis: from arterial to venous to venous limb gangrene. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16(11):2128-2132. doi:10.1111/jth.14264 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arepally GM, Padmanabhan A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a focus on thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(1):141-152. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315445 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types