Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar 26;15(1):2568.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44512-4.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Pooja Middha et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRSUC predicts all-grade IMC (ORmeta=1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10-03) and severe IMC (ORmeta=1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10-04). PRSCD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRSUC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (ORmeta=2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRSUC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.M.B. receives research support from Genentech/Roche and Incyte Corporation, has received advisory board payments from AstraZeneca and Mallinckrodt, and is an inventor on patents regarding immunotherapy targets and biomarkers in cancer. The remaining authors declare no other competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Overview of the analytical pipeline.
Development and validation of the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease was conducted in cancer-free individuals using UK Biobank and BioVU. LDPred2 method was used to tune the parameters for the PRS for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease (PRSUC, PRSCD) in 70% of the UK Biobank, using the summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association study of UC and CD. The PRSs were then tested in the remaining 30% of the UK Biobank and validated in BioVU. In the next step, the role of PRSUC and PRSCD on all-grade and severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) was evaluated in a cohort of 1316 non-small cell lung cancer patients who received at least one dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, replication was conducted using 873 pan-cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors obtained from BioVU. Finally, associations of all-grade and severe IMC along with PRSUC and PRSCD on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Cumulative incidence curves of all-grade and severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis by polygenic risk score of ulcerative colitis in the GeRI cohort.
Cumulative incidence curves of a All-grade immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) and b Severe IMC by categories of polygenic risk score of ulcerative colitis (PRSUC) in the entire GeRI cohort. Cumulative incidence curves are unadjusted, and PRSUC is categorized as ≤10th percentile (low genetic risk), 10–90th percentile (average genetic risk), and >90th percentile (high genetic risk). The p-values included on each plot are the results of a log-rank test for the difference between the curves (two-sided). Underneath each set of curves is the number of study participants at risk beyond that time point for each of the PRS groups. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in the entire GeRI cohort.
a All-grade IMC and b Severe IMC. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are unadjusted with 90-day landmark and compare those who had an IMC (all-grade or severe) with those who did not have an IMC (No IMC). The p-values in the graph represent the log-rank p-values (two-sided), and the dotted line represents the median survival time. Underneath each set of curves is the number of study participants at risk beyond that time point for the IMC and No IMC groups. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Update of

References

    1. Bai RL, Chen NF, Li LY, Cui JW. A brand new era of cancer immunotherapy: breakthroughs and challenges. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2021;134:1267–1275. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei SC, Duffy CR, Allison JP. Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1069–1086. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Twomey JD, Zhang B. Cancer immunotherapy update: FDA-approved checkpoint inhibitors and companion diagnostics. AAPS J. 2021;23:39. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00574-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharpe AH. Introduction to checkpoint inhibitors and cancer immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 2017;276:5–8. doi: 10.1111/imr.12531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances