Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;25(3):249-258.
doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00939-0. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Tinnitus: Clinical Insights in Its Pathophysiology-A Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Tinnitus: Clinical Insights in Its Pathophysiology-A Perspective

Berthold Langguth et al. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Tinnitus, the perception of sound without a corresponding external sound source, and tinnitus disorder, which is tinnitus with associated suffering, present a multifaceted clinical challenge due to its heterogeneity and its incompletely understood pathophysiology and especially due to the limited therapeutic options. In this narrative review, we give an overview on various clinical aspects of tinnitus including its heterogeneity, contributing factors, comorbidities and therapeutic pathways with a specific emphasis on the implications for its pathophysiology and future research directions. Tinnitus exhibits high perceptual variability between affected individuals (heterogeneity) and within affected individuals (temporal variability). Hearing loss emerges as predominant risk factor and the perceived pitch corresponds to areas of hearing loss, supporting the compensatory response theory. Whereas most people who have tinnitus can live a normal life, in 10-20% tinnitus interferes severely with quality of life. These patients suffer frequently from comorbidities such as anxiety, depression or insomnia, acting as both risk factors and consequences. Accordingly, neuroimaging studies demonstrate shared brain networks between tinnitus and stress-related disorders shedding light on the intricate interplay of mental health and tinnitus. The challenge lies in deciphering causative relationships and shared pathophysiological mechanisms. Stress, external sounds, time of day, head movements, distraction, and sleep quality can impact tinnitus perception. Understanding these factors provides insights into the interplay with autonomic, sensory, motor, and cognitive processes. Counselling and cognitive-behavioural therapy demonstrate efficacy in reducing suffering, supporting the involvement of stress and anxiety-related networks. Hearing improvement, especially through cochlear implants, reduces tinnitus and thus indirectly validates the compensatory nature of tinnitus. Brain stimulation techniques can modulate the suffering of tinnitus, presumably by alteration of stress-related brain networks. Continued research is crucial for unravelling the complexities of tinnitus. Progress in management hinges on decoding diverse manifestations, identifying treatment-responsive subtypes, and advancing targeted therapeutic approaches.

Keywords: Aetiology; Comorbidity; Heterogeneity; Pathophysiology; Tinnitus; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B. Langguth received honoraria for consultancy and speakers’ fees from ANM, AstraZeneca, Autifony Therapeutics, Decibel Therapeutics, Desyncra, Gerson Lehmanns Group, Lundbeck, Merz, MagVenture, Medical Tribune, Neurolite, Neuromod, Novartis, Pfizer, Rovi, Schwabe, Sea Pharma, Servier, Sonova and Sound Therapeutics; research funding from the Tinnitus Research Initiative, Bayhost, the German Research Foundation, the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, the American Tinnitus Association, AstraZeneca, cerbomed, Neuromod and the European Union; funding for equipment from MagVenture and Deymed Diagnostic; and travel and accommodation payments from Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, and Pfizer. He owns shares of Sea Pharma. D. De Ridder received honoraria for consultancy and speakers’ fees from Abbott laboratories and research funding from ATA and TRI. W. Schlee received honoraria for consultancy and speakers’ fess from Schwabe, Pohl-Boskamp, and Pansatori. He received funding from the EU, the Bavarian Research Foundation, the German Research Foundation, Innosuisse, and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation. He is stakeholder of the Lenox uG and the HealthStudyClub GmbH, which aim to translate scientific knowledge into digital health applications. T. Kleinjung received honoraria for consultancy and speaker’s fees form Sonova and Schwabe and travel and accommodation payments from Cochlear. His research was funded from the Tinnitus Research Initiative, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European Union, the Zurich Hearing Foundation and Cochlear.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27(11):676–682. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts LE, et al. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci. 2010;30(45):14972–14979. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4028-10.2010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Ridder D, et al. Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(20):8075–8080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018466108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elgoyhen AB, et al. Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(10):632–42. doi: 10.1038/nrn4003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rauschecker JP, Leaver AM, Mühlau M. Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron. 2010;66(6):819–826. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed