Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;4(3):184-191.
doi: 10.1038/s43588-024-00607-6. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Digital twins in medicine

Affiliations
Review

Digital twins in medicine

R Laubenbacher et al. Nat Comput Sci. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Medical digital twins, which are potentially vital for personalized medicine, have become a recent focus in medical research. Here we present an overview of the state of the art in medical digital twin development, especially in oncology and cardiology, where it is most advanced. We discuss major challenges, such as data integration and privacy, and provide an outlook on future advancements. Emphasizing the importance of this technology in healthcare, we highlight the potential for substantial improvements in patient-specific treatments and diagnostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests:

None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Applications for medical digital twins.
1) Keeping healthy patients healthy. For a given patient (in yellow), a safe cholesterol level is determined, using genetic information, family history, and other data. The yellow line indicates the trend of the patient’s cholesterol levels over time, if untreated. Yellow boxes represent measurements. The patient’s digital twin (blue), on the other hand, forecasts the trajectory and recommends periodic preventive interventions (blue arrows), resulting in cholesterol levels following the blue curve. 2) Restoring health in ill patients. Upon admission to the ICU the patient (green) is being evaluated and receives initial treatment. A computer algorithm personalizes an appropriate computational disease model, together with information from a database of reference patients to recommend optimal interventions. As more repeated measurements are taken from the patient, the reference population is refined, the model is re-calibrated to the patient at later time points, and the recommendations for optimal treatment are refined. The cones represent the likely trajectory of the infection as determined by the digital twin. With time and larger number of patient datapoints the uncertainty in the predictions decreases (the cone becomes narrower) and subsequent patient timepoints fall closer to the center of the previous prediction cone. The improvement in the parameter ensemble that describes the patient is reflected the corresponding virtual cohort that describes the patient at each timepoint, which is depicted as increasingly containing more females and green subjects, like the patient being treated. 3) Development of novel therapeutics. Currently, clinical trials typically involve the use of animals and patient cohorts; left panel. With the advent of MDTs, it will be possible to reduce the number of animals used in preclinical trials, and to optimize patient trials using virtual patients. They can be used to screen large numbers of drug targets, drug candidates and to perform initial optimization studies using large numbers of patient MDTs and virtual patients; middle panel. Optimal drug regimes, doses and combinations can also be inferred by MDT prior to administering drugs to patients, thus minimizing side effects; right panel.

References

    1. Adv. Comm. Dir. NIH, “The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program – Building a Research Foundation for 21 st Century Medicine,” Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/PMI_WG_report_2015-09-17-Final.pdf
    1. Eddy DM and Schlessinger L, “Archimedes: a trial-validated model of diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3093–3101, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomczak K, Czerwińska P, and Wiznerowicz M, “The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge,” Contemp. Oncol. Poznan Pol, vol. 19, no. 1A, pp. A68–77, 2015, doi: 10.5114/wo.2014.47136. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regev A et al., “The Human Cell Atlas,” eLife, vol. 6, p. e27041, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.7554/eLife.27041. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alber M et al., “Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling—perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences,” Npj Digit. Med, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0193-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources