Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 26;32(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00531-6.

A new role for spinal manual therapy and for chiropractic? Part I: weaknesses and threats

Søren Francis Dyhrberg O'Neill  1   2 , Casper Nim  3   4   5 , Dave Newell  6 , Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde  4
Affiliations

A new role for spinal manual therapy and for chiropractic? Part I: weaknesses and threats

Søren Francis Dyhrberg O'Neill et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

Spinal manual therapy is central to chiropractic history, clinical practice, and professional identity. That chiropractors have developed an expertise in this domain has provided some considerable advantages. However, we contend it is also at the crux of the ideological schism that fractures the chiropractic profession. In this article, which is the first in a series of two, we discuss chiropractors' understanding and use of spinal manual therapy and do so with particular emphasis on what we see as weaknesses it creates and threats it gives rise to. These are of particular importance, as we believe they have limited the chiropractic profession's development. As we shall argue, we believe that these threats have become existential in nature, and we are convinced that they call for a resolute and unified response by the profession. Subsequently, in part II, we discuss various strengths that the chiropractic profession possesses and the opportunities that await, provided that the profession is ready to rise to the challenge.

Keywords: Chiropractic; Chiropractic history; Professional development; Professional identity; Spinal manipulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ailliet L, Rubinstein SM, de Vet HCW. Characteristics of chiropractors and their patients in Belgium. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2010;33:618–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rupert RL. A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors. Maintenance care: part I. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2000;23:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(00)90107-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. French SD, Charity MJ, Forsdike K, Gunn JM, Polus BI, Walker BF, et al. Chiropractic Observation and Analysis Study (COAST): providing an understanding of current chiropractic practice. Med J Aust. 2013;199:687–91. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11851. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kvammen OC, Leboeuf-Yde C. The chiropractic profession in Norway 2011. Chiropr Man Ther. 2014;22:44. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0044-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beliveau PJH, Wong JJ, Sutton DA, Simon NB, Bussières AE, Mior SA, et al. The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided. Chiropr Man Ther. 2017;25:35. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0165-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed