Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):43.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00686-8.

A hierarchical fusion strategy of deep learning networks for detection and segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma from computed tomography images

Affiliations

A hierarchical fusion strategy of deep learning networks for detection and segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma from computed tomography images

I-Cheng Lee et al. Cancer Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: Automatic segmentation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on computed tomography (CT) scans is in urgent need to assist diagnosis and radiomics analysis. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning based network to detect HCC from dynamic CT images.

Methods: Dynamic CT images of 595 patients with HCC were used. Tumors in dynamic CT images were labeled by radiologists. Patients were randomly divided into training, validation and test sets in a ratio of 5:2:3, respectively. We developed a hierarchical fusion strategy of deep learning networks (HFS-Net). Global dice, sensitivity, precision and F1-score were used to measure performance of the HFS-Net model.

Results: The 2D DenseU-Net using dynamic CT images was more effective for segmenting small tumors, whereas the 2D U-Net using portal venous phase images was more effective for segmenting large tumors. The HFS-Net model performed better, compared with the single-strategy deep learning models in segmenting small and large tumors. In the test set, the HFS-Net model achieved good performance in identifying HCC on dynamic CT images with global dice of 82.8%. The overall sensitivity, precision and F1-score were 84.3%, 75.5% and 79.6% per slice, respectively, and 92.2%, 93.2% and 92.7% per patient, respectively. The sensitivity in tumors < 2 cm, 2-3, 3-5 cm and > 5 cm were 72.7%, 92.9%, 94.2% and 100% per patient, respectively.

Conclusions: The HFS-Net model achieved good performance in the detection and segmentation of HCC from dynamic CT images, which may support radiologic diagnosis and facilitate automatic radiomics analysis.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Deep learning; Detection; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Segmentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

YHH has received research grants from Gilead Sciences and Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and honoraria from Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, and Roche, and has served in an advisory role for Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The HFS-Net data flow for liver and tumor segmentation. Stage I: Identify tumor’s longest axis in every slice of a case. Stage II: Accord tumor size by feeding the CT slice which the longest axis of tumors over 30 pixels in the slice for flarge computation and which the longest axis less than 30 pixels of tumors in the slice for fsmall computation. Stage III: Combine venous phases of CT images and results of fliver, fsize, flarge, and fsmall as input of f3D computation for getting final segmentation of tumors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Performance of HFS-Net segmentation (left), detection (middle) and distribution of sizes of HCC (right)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of HFS-Net segmentation results from test dataset. A A 8.5 cm HCC representing large HCC (dice per case 88.1%). B A 4.6 cm HCC representing medium sized HCC (dice per case 80%). A A 8.5 cm HCC representing large HCC (dice per case 88.1%). C A 1.7 cm HCC representing BCLC stage 0 HCC (dice per case 83.6%). D A tumor was detected in the first three slices but missed in the marginal slice of the tumor. E A large tumor accurately segmented by HFS-Net, and a small tumor missed by radiologist labelling but detected by HFS-Net. The green line represents the radiologist’s label, the red line represents the output of HFS-Net for tumor margin, and the blue line represents the output of HFS-Net for liver margin

References

    1. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moura Cunha G, Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Sirlin CB. Up-to-date role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:513–27. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S268288. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waite S, Kolla S, Jeudy J, Legasto A, Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S, et al. Tired in the reading room: the influence of fatigue in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(2):191–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bera K, Braman N, Gupta A, Velcheti V, Madabhushi A. Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(2):132–46. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee IC, Huang JY, Chen TC, Yen CH, Chiu NC, Hwang HE, et al. Evolutionary learning-derived clinical-Radiomic models for Predicting Early recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection. Liver Cancer. 2021;10(6):572–82. doi: 10.1159/000518728. - DOI - PMC - PubMed