Machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with sepsis in the ICU based on clinical data
- PMID: 38533071
- PMCID: PMC10963609
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28143
Machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with sepsis in the ICU based on clinical data
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a fatal outcome of severe sepsis. Machine learning models are helpful for accurately predicting ARDS in patients with sepsis at an early stage.
Objective: We aim to develop a machine-learning model for predicting ARDS in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: The initial clinical data of patients with sepsis admitted to the hospital (including population characteristics, clinical diagnosis, complications, and laboratory tests) were used to predict ARDS, and screen out the crucial variables. After comparing eight different algorithms, namely, XG boost, logistic regression, light GBM, random forest, GaussianNB, complement NB, support vector machine (SVM), and K nearest neighbors (KNN), rebuilding a prediction model with the best one. When remodeling with the best algorithm, 10% was randomly selected to test, and the remaining was trained for cross-validation. Using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, F1 score, kappa value, and clinical decision curve to evaluate the model's performance. Eventually, the application in the model illustrated by the SHAP package.
Results: Ten critical features were screened utilizing the lasso method, namely, PaO2/PAO2, A-aDO2, PO2(T), CRP, gender, PO2, RDW, MCH, SG, and chlorine. The prior ranking of variables demonstrated that PaO2/PAO2 was the most significant variable. Among the eight algorithms, the performance of the Gaussian NB algorithm was significantly better than that of the others. After remodeling with the best algorithm, the AUC in the training and validation sets were 0.777 and 0.770, respectively, and the algorithm performed well in the test set (AUC = 0.781, accuracy = 78.6%, sensitivity = 82.4%, F1 score = 0.824). A comparison of the overlap factors with those of previous models revealed that the model we developed performs better.
Conclusion: Sepsis-associated ARDS can be accurately predicted early via a machine learning model based on existing clinical data. These findings are helpful for accurate identification and improvement of the prognosis in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS.
Keywords: ARDS; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Algorithm; ICU; Machine learning; Sepsis.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Predicting mortality and risk factors of sepsis related ARDS using machine learning models.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96501-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40251182 Free PMC article.
-
A machine learning model for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome risk in patients with sepsis using circulating immune cell parameters: a retrospective study.BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10974-8. BMC Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40259224 Free PMC article.
-
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023. PMID: 37545445 Chinese.
-
Predictive Modeling of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 13;27:e66615. doi: 10.2196/66615. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40359510 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Tools for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Detection and Prediction.Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;52(11):1768-1780. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006390. Epub 2024 Aug 12. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39133071 Review.
Cited by
-
Establishment and validation of predictive model of ARDS in critically ill patients.J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 13;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-06054-1. J Transl Med. 2025. PMID: 39806409 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a machine learning-based interpretable model for predicting sepsis by complete blood cell parameters.Heliyon. 2024 Jul 11;10(14):e34498. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34498. eCollection 2024 Jul 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39082026 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting mortality and risk factors of sepsis related ARDS using machine learning models.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96501-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40251182 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Support System for Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature Infants.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):2089. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072089. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38610854 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-based model for predicting the occurrence and mortality of nonpulmonary sepsis-associated ARDS.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79899-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39548234 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Villar J., et al. A clinical classification of the acute respiratory distress syndrome for predicting outcome and guiding medical therapy*. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43(2):346–353. - PubMed
-
- Fan E., Brodie D., Slutsky A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2018;319(7):698–710. - PubMed
-
- Ranieri V.M., et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–2533. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous