Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?
- PMID: 38534091
- DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13378
Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?
Abstract
Interobserver variability remains a major challenge for cytopathologists despite the development of standardized reporting and classification systems. Indeed, whereas moderate-to-good interobserver agreement is generally achievable when the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant entities is straightforward, high levels of variability make the diagnostic interpretation of atypical and suspicious samples not consistent. This review explores the landscape of interobserver agreement in cytopathology across different anatomical sites.
Keywords: cytology; interobserver; salivary gland; salivary gland cytology; thyroid cytology; variability.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cibas ES. We are minimally invasive diagnosis. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2021;10(2):113‐114.
-
- Monaco SE. Fine needle aspiration cytology. In: McManus LM, Mitchell RN, eds. Pathobiology of Human Disease. Academic Press; 2014:3379‐3398.
-
- Pitman MB, Black‐Schaffer WS. Post‐fine‐needle aspiration biopsy communication and the integrated and standardized cytopathology report. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(S6):486‐493.
-
- Nayar R, Wilbur DC, eds. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes. Springer International Publishing; 2015.
-
- Ali SZ, VanderLaan PA, eds. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes. Springer International Publishing; 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
