Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 20;11(3):290.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030290.

Effects of Stroboscopic Vision on Depth Jump Motor Control: A Biomechanical Analysis

Affiliations

Effects of Stroboscopic Vision on Depth Jump Motor Control: A Biomechanical Analysis

Kenneth D Harrison et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

Researchers commonly use the 'free-fall' paradigm to investigate motor control during landing impacts, particularly in drop landings and depth jumps (DJ). While recent studies have focused on the impact of vision on landing motor control, previous research fully removed continuous visual input, limiting ecological validity. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of stroboscopic vision on depth jump (DJ) motor control. Ground reaction forces (GRF) and lower-extremity surface electromyography (EMG) were collected for 20 young adults (11 male; 9 female) performing six depth jumps (0.51 m drop height) in each of two visual conditions (full vision vs. 3 Hz stroboscopic vision). Muscle activation magnitude was estimated from EMG signals using root-mean-square amplitudes (RMS) over specific time intervals (150 ms pre-impact; 30-60 ms, 60-85 ms, and 85-120 ms post-impact). The main effects of and interactions between vision and trial number were assessed using two-way within-subjects repeated measures analyses of variance. Peak GRF was 6.4% greater, on average, for DJs performed with stroboscopic vision compared to full vision (p = 0.042). Tibialis anterior RMS EMG during the 60-85 ms post-impact time interval was 14.1% lower for DJs performed with stroboscopic vision (p = 0.020). Vastus lateralis RMS EMG during the 85-120 ms post-impact time interval was 11.8% lower for DJs performed with stroboscopic vision (p = 0.017). Stroboscopic vision altered DJ landing mechanics and lower-extremity muscle activation. The observed increase in peak GRF and reduction in RMS EMG of the tibialis anterior and vastus lateralis post-landing may signify a higher magnitude of lower-extremity musculotendinous stiffness developed pre-landing. The results indicate measurable sensorimotor disruption for DJs performed with stroboscopic vision, warranting further research and supporting the potential use of stroboscopic vision as a sensorimotor training aid in exercise and rehabilitation. Stroboscopic vision could induce beneficial adaptations in multisensory integration, applicable to restoring sensorimotor function after injury and preventing injuries in populations experiencing landing impacts at night (e.g., military personnel).

Keywords: GRF; electromyography; landing; plyometric; sensory integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the investigation protocol. TA = tibialis anterior; GM = medial gastrocnemius; VL = vastus lateralis; VM = vastus medialis; BF = biceps femoris.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental set-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Visual condition × trial number interaction on vastus medialis medium-latency response. Electromyography data were collected from a sample of 20 young adults performing 0.51 m depth jumps under conditions of full and stroboscopic vision. Error bars represent ± 1 standard deviation. * Significantly different from full vision (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Helm M., Ritzmann R., Gollhofer A., Freyler K. Anticipation modulates neuromechanics of drop jumps in known or unknown ground stiffness. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211276. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campos J.L., Marusic U., Mahoney J.R. The intersection of cognitive, motor, and sensory processing in aging: Links to functional outcomes. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1009532. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1009532. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peterka R.J. Sensory integration for human balance control. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018;159:27–42. - PubMed
    1. Kim K.M., Kim J.S., Oh J., Grooms D.R. Stroboscopic vision as a dynamic sensory reweighting alternative to the sensory organization test. J. Sport Rehabil. 2020;30:166–172. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0466. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anson E., Jeka J. Sensory Reweighting: A Rehabilitative Mechanism? In: Armstrong C.L., Morrow L.A., editors. Handbook of Medical Neuropsychology: Applications of Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2019. pp. 789–800.

LinkOut - more resources