Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 21;9(1):5.
doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010005.

Internal or External Training Load Metrics: Which Is Best for Tracking Autonomic Nervous System Recovery and Function in Collegiate American Football?

Eric Renaghan  1 , Harrison L Wittels  2 , S Howard Wittels  2   3   4   5 , Michael Joseph Wishon  2 , Dustin Hecocks  2 , Eva D Wittels  2 , Stephanie Hendricks  2 , Joe Girardi  6 , Stephen J Lee  7 , Samantha M McDonald  2   8 , Luis A Feigenbaum  1   6
Affiliations

Internal or External Training Load Metrics: Which Is Best for Tracking Autonomic Nervous System Recovery and Function in Collegiate American Football?

Eric Renaghan et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. .

Abstract

Sport coaches increasingly rely on external load metrics for designing effective training programs. However, their accuracy in estimating internal load is inconsistent, and their ability to predict autonomic nervous system (ANS) deterioration is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between internal and external training load metrics and ANS recovery and function in college football players. Football athletes were recruited from a D1 college in the southeastern US and prospectively followed for 27 weeks. Internal load was estimated via exercise cardiac load (ECL; average training heartrate (HR) × session duration) and measured with an armband monitor equipped with electrocardiographic capabilities (Warfighter MonitorTM (WFM), Tiger Tech Solutions, Miami, FL, USA). External load was estimated via the summation and rate of acceleration and decelerations as measured by a triaxial accelerometer using the WFM and an accelerometer-based (ACCEL) device (Catapult Player Load, Catapult Sports, Melbourne, Australia) worn on the mid-upper back. Baseline HR, HR variability (HRV) and HR recovery served as the indicators for ANS recovery and function, respectively. For HRV, two, time-domain metrics were measured: the standard deviation of the NN interval (SDNN) and root mean square of the standard deviation of the NN interval (rMSSD). Linear regression models evaluated the associations between ECL, ACCEL, and the indicators of ANS recovery and function acutely (24 h) and cumulatively (one- and two-week). Athletes (n = 71) were male and, on average, 21.3 ± 1.4 years of age. Acute ECL elicited stronger associations for 24 h baseline HR (R2 0.19 vs. 0.03), HR recovery (R2 0.38 vs. 0.07), SDNN (R2 0.19 vs. 0.02) and rMSSD (R2 0.19 vs. 0.02) compared to ACCEL. Similar results were found for one-week: 24 h baseline HR (R2 0.48 vs. 0.05), HR recovery (R2 0.55 vs. 0.05), SDNN (R2 0.47 vs. 0.05) and rMSSD (R2 0.47 vs. 0.05) and two-week cumulative exposures: 24 h baseline HR (R2 0.52 vs. 0.003), HR recovery (R2 0.57 vs. 0.05), SDNN (R2 0.52 vs. 0.003) and rMSSD (R2 0.52 vs. 0.002). Lastly, the ACCEL devices weakly correlated with ECL (rho = 0.47 and 0.43, p < 0.005). Our findings demonstrate that ACCEL poorly predicted ANS deterioration and underestimated internal training load. ACCEL devices may "miss" the finite window for preventing ANS deterioration by potentially misestimating training loads acutely and cumulatively.

Keywords: ANS; American football; accelerometer; collegiate; deterioration; exercise cardiac load; overtraining; training load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors are paid employees of Tiger Tech Solutions Inc, owner of the Warfighter Monitor (WFM) used in this study: S.H.W., M.J.W., H.L.W., E.D.W., S.H., D.H. and S.M.M. Authors J.G., S.J.L., L.A.F. and E.R. have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Collegiate American football training schematic.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Foster C., Daines E., Hector L., Snyder A.C., Welsh R. Athletic Performance in Relation to Training Load. Wis. Med. J. 1996;95:370–374. - PubMed
    1. Campbell B.I., Bove D., Ward P., Vargas A., Dolan J. Quantification of Training Load and Training Response for Improving Athletic Performance. Strength. Cond. J. 2017;39:3–13. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000334. - DOI
    1. Renaghan E., Wittels H.L., Feigenbaum L.A., Wishon M.J., Chong S., Wittels E.D., Hendricks S., Hecocks D., Bellamy K., Girardi J., et al. Exercise Cardiac Load and Autonomic Nervous System Recovery during In-Season Training: The Impact on Speed Deterioration in American Football Athletes. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023;8:134. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wittels S.H., Renaghan E., Wishon M.J., Wittels H.L., Chong S., Wittels E.D., Hendricks S., Hecocks D., Bellamy K., Girardi J., et al. Recovery of the Autonomic Nervous System Following Football Training among Division I Collegiate Football Athletes: The Influence of Intensity and Time. Heliyon. 2023;9:e18125. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manresa-Rocamora A., Flatt A.A., Casanova-Lizón A., Ballester-Ferrer J.A., Sarabia J.M., Vera-Garcia F.J., Moya-Ramón M. Heart Rate-Based Indices to Detect Parasympathetic Hyperactivity in Functionally Overreached Athletes. A Meta-Analysis. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2021;31:1164–1182. doi: 10.1111/sms.13932. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources