Bothrops lanceolatus Envenoming in Martinique: A Historical Perspective of the Clinical Effectiveness of Bothrofav Antivenom Treatment
- PMID: 38535812
- PMCID: PMC10976126
- DOI: 10.3390/toxins16030146
Bothrops lanceolatus Envenoming in Martinique: A Historical Perspective of the Clinical Effectiveness of Bothrofav Antivenom Treatment
Abstract
Bothrofav, a monospecific antivenom, was introduced in June 1991 and has shown excellent effectiveness against life-threatening and thrombotic complications of Bothrops lanceolatus envenoming. Because of the reoccurrence of cerebral stroke events despite the timely administration of antivenom, new batches of Bothrofav were produced and introduced into clinical use in January 2011. This study's aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Bothrofav generations at treating B. lanceolatus envenoming. During the first period of the study (2000-2010), 107 patients were treated with vials of antivenom produced in June 1991, while 282 envenomed patients were treated with vials of antivenom produced in January 2011 in the second study period (2011-2023). Despite timely antivenom administration, thrombotic complications reoccurred after an interval free of thrombotic events, and a timeframe analysis suggested that the clinical efficacy of Bothrofav declined after it reached its 10-year shelf-life. In of the case of an antivenom shortage due to the absence of regular batch production, no adverse effects were identified before the antivenom reached its 10-year shelf-life, which is beyond the accepted shelf-life for a liquid-formulation antivenom. While our study does not support the use of expired antivenom for potent, life-threatening B. lanceolatus envenoming, it can be a scientific message to public entities proving the necessity of new antivenom production for B. lanceolatus envenoming.
Keywords: Bothrofav; Bothrops lanceolatus; antivenom shortage; efficacy; envenoming; snakebite; thrombosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Cavalcante J.S., de Almeida D.E.G., Santos-Filho N.A., Sartim M.A., Baldo A.d.A., Brasileiro L., Albuquerque P.L., Oliveira S.S., Sachett J.A.G., Monteiro W.M., et al. Crosstalk of inflammation and coagulation in Bothrops snakebite envenoming: Endogenous signaling pathways and pathophysiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:11508. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411508. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Monteiro W.M., Contreras-Bernal J.C., Bisneto P.F., Sachett J., Da Silva I.M., Lacerda M., Da Costa A.G., Val F., Brasileiro L., Sartim M.A., et al. Bothrops atrox, the most important snake involved in human envenomings in the Amazon: How venomics contributes to the knowledge of snake biology and clinical toxinology. Toxicon X. 2020;6:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gutiérrez J.M., Sanz L., Escolano J., Fernández J., Lomonte B., Angulo Y., Rucavado A., Warrell D.A., Calvete J.J. Snake venomics of the Lesser Antillean pit vipers Bothrops caribbaeus and Bothrops lanceolatus: Correlation with toxicological activities and immunoreactivity of a het-erologous antivenom. J. Proteome Res. 2008;7:4396–4408. doi: 10.1021/pr8003826. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources