Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 28;12(3):183.
doi: 10.3390/toxics12030183.

Advancing Endocrine Disruptors via In Vitro Evaluation: Recognizing the Significance of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development and United States Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines, Embracing New Assessment Methods, and the Urgent Need for a Comprehensive Battery of Tests

Affiliations
Review

Advancing Endocrine Disruptors via In Vitro Evaluation: Recognizing the Significance of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development and United States Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines, Embracing New Assessment Methods, and the Urgent Need for a Comprehensive Battery of Tests

Sophie Fouyet et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

Efforts are being made globally to improve the evaluation and understanding of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Recognition of their impact on human health and the environment has stimulated attention and research in this field. Various stakeholders, including scientists, regulatory agencies, policymakers, and industry representatives, are collaborating to develop robust methodologies and guidelines for assessing these disruptors. A key aspect of these efforts is the development of standardized testing protocols and guidelines that aim to provide consistent and reliable methods for identifying and characterizing endocrine disruptors. When evaluating the potential endocrine-disrupting activity of chemicals, no single test is capable of detecting all relevant endocrine-disrupting agents. The test battery approach is designed to reduce the risk of false negative results for compounds with toxic potential. A weight-of-evidence approach is therefore necessary for endocrine disruptor evaluation. This approach considers various types of data from multiple sources, assessing the overall strength, consistency, and reliability of the evidence. OECD guidelines are highly regarded for their scientific rigor, transparency, and consensus-based development process. It is crucial to explore and develop new methodologies that can effectively evaluate the risks associated with potential endocrine disruptors. Integrating these methods into a comprehensive weight-of-evidence framework will enhance risk assessments and facilitate informed decisions regarding the regulation and management of these substances, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment from their adverse effects.

Keywords: alternative method; endocrine disruptor; in vitro; validation; weight of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Formation of the receptor–ligand complex leading to DNA binding and, subsequently, light emission. In vitro tests are conducted using genetically modified cell lines expressing the luciferase gene to detect the transcriptional activation or inhibition activity on hormone receptors induced by a chemical.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Steroidogenic pathway (from Test No. 456: H295R Steroidogenesis Assay [41]. Enzymes are in italics, hormones are bolded, and arrows indicate the direction of synthesis. Gray background indicates corticoid pathways/products. Sex steroid pathways/products are circled. CYP = cytochrome P450; HSD = hydroxysteroid hydrogenase; DHEA = dehydroepiandrosterone.

References

    1. WHO/IPCS (WHO, International Programme on Chemical Safety) Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors. WHO/PCS/EDC/02.2. 2002. [(accessed on 22 February 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-PSC-EDC-02.2.
    1. Kabir E.R., Rahman M.S., Rahman I. A Review on Endocrine Disruptors and Their Possible Impacts on Human Health. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015;40:241–258. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salazar P., Villaseca P., Cisternas P., Inestrosa N.C. Neurodevelopmental Impact of the Offspring by Thyroid Hormone System-Disrupting Environmental Chemicals during Pregnancy. Environ. Res. 2021;200:111345. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111345. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lahimer M., Abou Diwan M., Montjean D., Cabry R., Bach V., Ajina M., Ben Ali H., Benkhalifa M., Khorsi-Cauet H. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Male Fertility: From Physiological to Molecular Effects. Front. Public Health. 2023;11:1232646. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1232646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raja G.L., Subhashree K.D., Kantayya K.E. In Utero Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors and Developmental Neurotoxicity: Implications for Behavioural and Neurological Disorders in Adult Life. Environ. Res. 2022;203:111829. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111829. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources