Applying the IEEE BRAIN neuroethics framework to intra-cortical brain-computer interfaces
- PMID: 38537269
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad3852
Applying the IEEE BRAIN neuroethics framework to intra-cortical brain-computer interfaces
Abstract
Objective. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are neuroprosthetic devices that allow for direct interaction between brains and machines. These types of neurotechnologies have recently experienced a strong drive in research and development, given, in part, that they promise to restore motor and communication abilities in individuals experiencing severe paralysis. While a rich literature analyzes the ethical, legal, and sociocultural implications (ELSCI) of these novel neurotechnologies, engineers, clinicians and BCI practitioners often do not have enough exposure to these topics.Approach. Here, we present the IEEE Neuroethics Framework, an international, multiyear, iterative initiative aimed at developing a robust, accessible set of considerations for diverse stakeholders.Main results. Using the framework, we provide practical examples of ELSCI considerations for BCI neurotechnologies. We focus on invasive technologies, and in particular, devices that are implanted intra-cortically for medical research applications.Significance. We demonstrate the utility of our framework in exposing a wide range of implications across different intra-cortical BCI technology modalities and conclude with recommendations on how to utilize this knowledge in the development and application of ethical guidelines for BCI neurotechnologies.
Keywords: BCI; intra-cortical; medical research; neuroethics; neurotechnologies.
Creative Commons Attribution license.
Similar articles
-
The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems.Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016 Oct;25(4):623-33. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000359. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016. PMID: 27634714
-
Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 29121942 Free PMC article.
-
Towards clinical application of implantable brain-computer interfaces for people with late-stage ALS: medical and ethical considerations.J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1323-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11464-6. Epub 2022 Nov 30. J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 36450968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
NeuroEthics and the BRAIN Initiative: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):140-147. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1778119. AJOB Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32716747
-
Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Blessing or the Beginning of a Dystopian Future?Cureus. 2024 Apr 14;16(4):e58243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58243. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38745805 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Brain-computer interfaces re-shape functional neurosurgery.Neural Regen Res. 2026 Mar 1;21(3):1122-1123. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01336. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Neural Regen Res. 2026. PMID: 40522765 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses.Cell. 2025 Aug 21;188(17):4658-4673.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.015. Epub 2025 Aug 14. Cell. 2025. PMID: 40816265 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources