Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
- PMID: 38538174
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.008
Prognostic Implications of Microvascular Resistance Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel index reflecting coronary microcirculatory function, irrespective of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. There is limited evidence regarding whether MRR can be an independent prognostic tool in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes according to MRR in patients with stable IHD accompanied with or without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis.
Methods: The present study included 547 consecutive patients undergoing systematic echocardiographic and invasive physiological assessment for suspected stable IHD. Significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis was defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined as MRR ≤3.0. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure.
Results: Among the study group, 172 patients (31.4%) had FFR ≤0.80, and 200 patients (36.6%) had CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0. MRR showed no significant correlation with FFR (R = -0.031; P = 0.469), but it was significantly correlated with the index of microcirculatory resistance (R = -0.353; P < 0.001), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (R = -0.296; P < 0.001), left ventricular filling pressure (E/e' ratio) (R = -0.224; P < 0.001), and diastolic dysfunction grade (P < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 3.3 years (Q1-Q3: 2.0-4.5 years), MRR was significantly associated with MACE risk (HR: 1.23 per 1-U decrease; 95% CI: 1.12-1.36; P < 0.001). CMD defined by MRR ≤3.0 was associated with an increased MACE risk for both FFR >0.80 (41.0% vs 26.0%; adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.35; P = 0.021) and FFR ≤0.80 (34.7% vs 14.8%; adjusted HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.12-4.82; P = 0.024).
Conclusions: Decreased MRR was associated with the presence of cardiac diastolic dysfunction as well as increased left ventricular filling pressure. The presence of CMD defined by MRR was independently associated with the risk for a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and admission for heart failure in patients with stable IHD, irrespective of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. (Prognostic Impact of Cardiac Diastolic Function and Coronary Microvascular Function [DIAST-CMD]; NCT05058833).
Keywords: coronary flow reserve; coronary microvascular dysfunction; index of microcirculatory resistance; microvascular resistance reserve.
Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr S.H. Lee has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular. Dr J.M. Lee has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Philips Volcano, Terumo Corporation, Donga-ST, Zoll Medical, and Yuhan Pharmaceutical. Prof Hahn has received an institutional research grant from the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Donga-ST, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
