Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;105(5):e4292.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.4292. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Integrated distance sampling models for simple point counts

Affiliations

Integrated distance sampling models for simple point counts

Marc Kéry et al. Ecology. 2024 May.

Abstract

Point counts (PCs) are widely used in biodiversity surveys but, despite numerous advantages, simple PCs suffer from several problems: detectability, and therefore abundance, is unknown; systematic spatiotemporal variation in detectability yields biased inferences, and unknown survey area prevents formal density estimation and scaling-up to the landscape level. We introduce integrated distance sampling (IDS) models that combine distance sampling (DS) with simple PC or detection/nondetection (DND) data to capitalize on the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses of each data type. Key to IDS models is the view of simple PC and DND data as aggregations of latent DS surveys that observe the same underlying density process. This enables the estimation of separate detection functions, along with distinct covariate effects, for all data types. Additional information from repeat or time-removal surveys, or variable survey duration, enables the separate estimation of the availability and perceptibility components of detectability with DS and PC data. IDS models reconcile spatial and temporal mismatches among data sets and solve the above-mentioned problems of simple PC and DND data. To fit IDS models, we provide JAGS code and the new "IDS()" function in the R package unmarked. Extant citizen-science data generally lack the information necessary to adjust for detection biases, but IDS models address this shortcoming, thus greatly extending the utility and reach of these data. In addition, they enable formal density estimation in hybrid designs, which efficiently combine DS with distance-free, point-based PC or DND surveys. We believe that IDS models have considerable scope in ecology, management, and monitoring.

Keywords: abundance; availability probability; biodiversity monitoring; citizen science; community science; detection/nondetection data; distance sampling; integrated model; participatory science; perceptibility; point count data.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Alldredge, M. W., T. R. Simons, and K. H. Pollock. 2007. “Factors Affecting Aural Detections of Songbirds.” Ecological Applications 17: 948–955.
    1. Amundson, C. L., J. A. Royle, and C. M. Handel. 2014. “A Hierarchical Model Combining Distance Sampling and Time Removal to Estimate Detection Probability during Avian Point Counts.” Auk 131: 476–494.
    1. Balmer, D. E., S. Gillings, B. J. Caffrey, B. Swann, I. S. Downie, and R. J. Fuller. 2013. Bird Atlas 2007–11: The Breeding and Wintering Birds of Britain and Ireland. Thetford: BTO Books.
    1. Besbeas, P., S. N. Freeman, B. J. T. Morgan, and E. A. Catchpole. 2002. “Integrating Mark‐Recapture‐Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters.” Biometrics 58: 540–547.
    1. Borchers, D. L., and M. G. Efford. 2008. “Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture‐Recapture Studies.” Biometrics 64: 377–385.

Publication types