Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7.

A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department

Affiliations

A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department

Ally Memedovich et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The high utilization of acute care services, particularly emergency departments (ED), continues to be a significant concern for healthcare providers. Numerous approaches have been studied to meet the care needs of patients who frequently seek care in the ED; however, there is no comprehensive review of the current literature base. As such, a current understanding of the interventions initiated within the ED to address the needs of frequent users is required. This mapping review had three objectives: identify the characteristics associated with the need to frequently seek care in the ED; identify interventions implemented to address the needs of this population; and identify gaps in the current evidence base.

Methods: A knowledge map was created by scoping the literature to identify characteristics associated with frequent ED use and interventions implemented to address frequent use. Then, a literature search was conducted to determine what has been implemented by EDs to reduce frequent ED use. The literature was searched from 2013 to January 2023. MeSH terms and keywords were used to identify relevant studies. Studies implementing an intervention for those with characteristics associated with frequent ED use and reporting on ED use were included.

Results: Twenty-three (23) controlled trials and 35 observational studies were included. The most common populations were older adults, those with chronic conditions, and generic "frequent users". No studies assessed Indigenous Peoples or racial minorities, and few assessed patients with a disability or patients experiencing homelessness. The most common interventions were referrals, care plans, case management, care coordination, and follow-up phone calls. Most studies reported ED revisits, hospitalization, costs, length-of-stay, or outpatient utilization. Few assessed patient or staff perspectives. About one-third of studies (n = 24) reported significant reductions in ED revisits.

Conclusions: Similar interventions, mainly focused on care coordination and planning, have been implemented to address frequent use of the ED. There are still significant gaps in the populations that have been studied. Efforts now must be undertaken to study more diverse populations whose care needs are not being met elsewhere and thus frequent the ED often.

Keywords: Emergency department; Frequent users; Knowledge map; Mapping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests. The Health Technology Assessment Unit is supported by a general grant from Alberta Health (the ministry of health in the province of Alberta) to undertake a wide range of evidence syntheses as part of the Health Evidence Review process.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study characteristics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Outcomes reported in the literature
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Stratification by gender

References

    1. Moe J, Kirkland SW, Rawe E, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to decrease Emergency Department visits by adult frequent users: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(1):40–52. doi: 10.1111/acem.13060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shumway M, Boccellari A, O’Brien K, Okin RL. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(2):155–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spillane LL, Lumb EW, Cobaugh DJ, Wilcox SR, Clark JS, Schneider SM. Frequent users of the emergency department: can we intervene? Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4(6):574–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03581.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alnasser S, Alharbi M. Analysis of Emergency Department Use by Non-urgent patients and their visit characteristics at an academic Center. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:221–32. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S391126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Cathain A, Connell J, Long J, Coster J. Clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: a realist review of patients’ decision making. Health Expect. 2020;23(1):19–40. doi: 10.1111/hex.12995. - DOI - PMC - PubMed