Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 14;60(3):485.
doi: 10.3390/medicina60030485.

The Association between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Mortality Risk after Hip Fracture: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

The Association between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Mortality Risk after Hip Fracture: A Meta-Analysis

Bao Tu Thai Nguyen et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Hip fractures in the elderly pose a considerable health risk and cause concern. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a valuable marker for identifying patients at high risk of age-related mortality and various disorders and diseases. However, its association with poor patient outcomes following hip fractures has yet to be fully established. Hence, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate and gain a better understanding of the relationship between RDW levels and the risk of mortality after hip fractures. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and other databases were comprehensively searched until April 2023 to identify relevant studies. The meta-analysis included observational studies finding the association between RDW at admission or preoperation and short-term and long-term mortality rates following hip fractures. The results were presented in terms of odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: This meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 5834 patients with hip fractures. Patients with preoperative RDW of over 14.5% had higher risks of 1-year (OR: 5.40, 95% CI: 1.89-15.48, p = 0.002) and 3-month (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.42-5.95, p = 0.004) mortality. Higher admission or preoperative RDW was significantly associated with an 11% higher mortality risk after 1 year (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06-1.17, p < 0.00001). Patients with higher preoperative RDW had a significantly higher risk of 6-month mortality, which was three times that of those with lower preoperative RDW (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.60-5.61, p = 0.0006). Higher preoperative RDW was correlated to a higher 30-day mortality risk (OR: 6.44, 95% CI: 3.32-12.47, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: Greater RDW values at admission or before surgery were associated with a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality following hip fractures. Because RDW can be easily measured using a routine blood test at a low cost, this parameter is promising as an indicator of mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures.

Keywords: bone healing; chronic inflammation; fragility; hip fracture; meta-analysis; mortality; oxidative stress; prognosis; red blood cell distribution width.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The study screening and selection process flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the association between RDW and 1-year mortality risk after hip fractures [13,33,34,36].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the association between RDW and 6-month mortality risk after hip fractures [13,14,32,36].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the association between RDW and 3-month mortality risk after hip fractures [13,34,36].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the association between RDW and 30-day mortality risk after hip fractures [35,36].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kanis J.A., Odén A., McCloskey E.V., Johansson H., Wahl D.A., Cooper C., on behalf of the IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:2239–2256. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mattisson L., Bojan A., Enocson A. Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: Data from the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2018;19:369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2276-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adeyemi A., Delhougne G. Incidence and Economic Burden of Intertrochanteric Fracture. JBJS Open Access. 2019;4:e0045. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Y.-P., Kuo Y.-J., Liu C.-H., Chien P.-C., Chang W.-C., Lin C.-Y., Pakpour A.H. Prognostic factors for 1-year functional outcome, quality of life, care demands, and mortality after surgery in Taiwanese geriatric patients with a hip fracture: A prospective cohort study. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2021;13:1759720X211028360. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211028360. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lizaur-Utrilla A., Martinez-Mendez D., Collados-Maestre I., Miralles-Muñoz F.A., Marco-Gomez L., Lopez-Prats F.A. Early surgery within 2 days for hip fracture is not reliable as healthcare quality indicator. Injury. 2016;47:1530–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.040. - DOI - PubMed