Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment Factors and Odds Related to Acute Pesticide Poisoning: A Meta-Analysis Report
- PMID: 38541259
- PMCID: PMC10970141
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030257
Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment Factors and Odds Related to Acute Pesticide Poisoning: A Meta-Analysis Report
Abstract
Introduction: Acute pesticide poisoning (APP) continues to affect farm workers, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The dose-response relationship between exposure and APP is well-researched, but pesticide exposure assessment in a practical environment is difficult to perform, considering various work practices and protections in place. It is well known that inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE) use is a risk factor of APP. However, it is unknown which types of inadequate PPE use, such as face or other types of general protection, are most harmful.
Methods: This study aimed to identify if inadequate PPE use is an indicator of APP risk following established specifications for meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Included studies reported an odds ratio (OR) between PPE use to APP in agricultural workers. Data extracted from selected articles included authors, publication year, country of origin, farm type, population size, method of data collection and time frame of reported symptoms, job task, type of PPE and pesticides used, adjustments made in analysis, OR for APP, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, where ORs were pooled to assess an overall estimate for poisoning odds.
Results: Our findings suggested that inadequate PPE use was associated with increased odds (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.16-2.12) of having APP. Failure to use general protection and inadequate face protection increased odds of APP by 1.29 times (95% CI = 0.88-1.90) and 1.92 times (95% CI = 1.23-3.00), respectively.
Conclusions: The meta-analysis results indicate that improper facial protection and general protection are not differently associated with APP odds. Our study concludes that more robust protection against inhalation and dermal contact are critical because any gaps in comprehensive full-body PPE would put workers and exposed populations at APP risk.
Keywords: PPE; acute exposure; odds ratio; pesticide poisoning.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Factors affecting use of personal protective equipment and pesticide safety practices: A systematic review.Environ Res. 2020 Jun;185:109444. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109444. Epub 2020 Mar 30. Environ Res. 2020. PMID: 32247154
-
The impact of the use of personal-protective-equipment on the minimization of effects of exposure to pesticides among farm-workers in India.Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;11:1075448. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1075448. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37026139 Free PMC article.
-
Farmers' knowledge, practices and injuries associated with pesticide exposure in rural farming villages in Tanzania.BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 23;14:389. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-389. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24754959 Free PMC article.
-
Is prevention of acute pesticide poisoning effective and efficient, with Locally Adapted Personal Protective Equipment? A randomized crossover study among farmers in Chitwan, Nepal.Med Lav. 2016 Jul 26;107(4):271-83. Med Lav. 2016. PMID: 27464900 Clinical Trial.
-
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32412096 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Proportional mortality and years of potential life lost due to liver diseases among agricultural workers, Brazil, 2017 to 2022.Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Jan 27;41(1):e00101424. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN101424. eCollection 2025. Cad Saude Publica. 2025. PMID: 39879395 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wanner N., DeSantis G., Alcibiade A., Tubiello F.N. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief 46. Pesticides Use, Pesticides Trade and Pesticides Indicators. Global, Regional and Country Trends, 1990–2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics; Rome, Italy: 2022. [(accessed on 29 May 2023)]. Report No.: 46. Available online: http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc0918en.
-
- Shattuck A., Werner M., Mempel F., Dunivin Z., Galt R. Global pesticide use and trade database (GloPUT): New estimates show pesticide use trends in low-income countries substantially underestimated. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2023;81:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102693. - DOI
-
- Rani L., Thapa K., Kanojia N., Sharma N., Singh S., Grewal A.S., Srivastav A.L., Kaushal J. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;283:124657. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical