Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 1;21(3):288.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030288.

Factors Influencing Abortion Decision-Making of Adolescents and Young Women: A Narrative Scoping Review

Affiliations

Factors Influencing Abortion Decision-Making of Adolescents and Young Women: A Narrative Scoping Review

Yui Koiwa et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, about half of all induced abortions have been estimated to be unsafe, which results in 13% of maternal deaths yearly. Of these induced abortions, 41% of unsafe abortions have been reported in young women who are dependent on their parents for their livelihood. They are often left in a vulnerable position and may have difficulty in making a decision regarding abortion. This study aimed to (1) characterize and map factors that influence abortion decision-making of adolescents and young women, and (2) identify the care and support that they need in their decision-making process.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the JBI method and PRISMA-ScR checklist. We comprehensively searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycInfo, and hand searched publications in the Google Scholar database between November 2021 and October 2023. The search included all English language qualitative and mixed methods research articles published on the database up to October 2023 that included participants aged 10-24 years. The CASP checklist was used as a guide for the qualitative analysis. NVivo was used to synthesize the findings.

Results: There were 18 studies from 14 countries (N = 1543 young women) that met the inclusion criteria. Three domains and eleven categories were included as follows: personal (desire for self-realization and unwanted pregnancy), interpersonal (parental impact, reaction of partner, roles of peers and friends, existence of own child, and lack of support), and social circumstances (sexual crime, financial problem, limitation of choice, and underutilized healthcare services). Decision-making factors regarding abortions were also found across all three domains.

Conclusion: The abortion decision-making of young women is influenced by various external factors regardless of country. Parents are especially influential and tend to force their daughters to make a decision. Young women experienced suffering, frustration, and lack of autonomy in making decisions based on their preference. This emphasizes the importance of autonomous decision-making. In this regard, healthcare services should be used. However, there are barriers to accessing these services. To improve such access, the following are required: staff training to provide adolescent and youth-friendly health services, counseling based on women's needs, counseling including the parents or guardians that is confidential and ethical, promotion of decision aids, and affordable accessible care.

Keywords: abortion; adolescent pregnancy; decision-making; factor; qualitative research; young women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews, which included searches of databases, registers, and other sources [27]. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (accessed on 23 January 2024).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Abortion. [(accessed on 25 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion.
    1. Sedgh G., Singh S., Shah I.H., Åhman E., Henshaw S.K., Bankole A. Induced abortion: Incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet. 2012;379:625–632. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah I.H., Åhman E. Unsafe abortion differentials in 2008 by age and developing country region: High burden among young women. Reprod. Health Matters. 2012;20:169–173. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39598-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008 Sixth Edition. [(accessed on 25 November 2021)]. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44529/9789241501118_eng.....
    1. Grimes D.A., Benson J., Singh S., Romero M., Ganatra B., Okonofua F.E., Shah I.H. Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006;368:1908–1919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types