Evaluation of the Fusion Rate and Safety of Escherichia coli-Derived rhBMP-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial
- PMID: 38541958
- PMCID: PMC10971261
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061733
Evaluation of the Fusion Rate and Safety of Escherichia coli-Derived rhBMP-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial
Abstract
Background: Few studies have documented the viability of E. coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This study aimed to assess the safety and fusion rate of rhBMP-2 in TLIF. Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial, and 30 patients needing one- or two-level TLIF were enrolled. Fusion rate was assessed using the 12-month interbody fusion rate on CT. Postoperative problems, including seroma, radiculitis, and ectopic bone formation, which have been documented as risks associated with rhBMP-2 in prior studies, were recorded. Results: The study demonstrated fusion outcomes in all instances at 52 and 104 weeks post-surgery. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes, with ODI, SF-36, and VAS scores, all achieving statistical significance (p < 0.0001). No perioperative adverse events requiring reoperation were reported, and there were no incidences of seroma, radiculitis, cage migration, grafted bone extrusion, postoperative neurologic deficit, or deep wound infection. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the high safety and efficacy in inducing bone fusion of E. coli-derived rhBMP-2 in TLIF, with a notable absence of adverse postoperative complications. Trial registration: This study protocol was registered at Korea Clinical Research Information Service (number identifier: KCT0004738) on July 2020.
Keywords: fusion rate; lumbar; rhBMP-2; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Ratliff J.K., Lebude B., Albert T., Anene-Maidoh T., Anderson G., Dagostino P., Maltenfort M., Hilibrand A., Sharan A., Vaccaro A.R. Complications in spinal surgery: Comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2009;10:578–584. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE0935. - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Kunder S.L., van Kuijk S.M.J., Rijkers K., Caelers I., van Hemert W.L.W., de Bie R.A., van Santbrink H. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2017;17:1712–1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rathbone J., Rackham M., Nielsen D., Lee S.M., Hing W., Riar S., Scott-Young M. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (alif) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif), posterolateral lumbar fusion (plf) Eur. Spine J. 2023;32:1911–1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources