Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center
- PMID: 38542019
- PMCID: PMC10971725
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061795
Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center
Abstract
Background: The popularity of robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer is increasing, but its superiority over the laparoscopic approach regarding safety, efficacy, and costs has not been well established. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted comparing consecutively performed robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgeries for rectal cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 September 2021. In total, 125 adult patients with sporadic rectal adenocarcinoma (distal extent ≤ 15 cm from the anal verge) underwent surgery where 66 were operated on robotically and 59 laparoscopically. Results: Severe postoperative complications occurred less frequently with robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic surgery, as indicated by Clavien-Dindo classification grades 3b-5 (13.6% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.029). Multiple logistic regression analyses after backward selection revealed that robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a lower rate of total (Clavien-Dindo grades 1-5) (OR = 0.355; 95% CI 0.156-0.808; p = 0.014) and severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 3b-5) (OR = 0.243; 95% CI 0.088-0.643; p = 0.005). Total inpatient costs (median EUR 17.663 [IQR EUR 10.151] vs. median EUR 14.089 [IQR EUR 12.629]; p = 0.018) and surgery costs (median EUR 10.156 [IQR EUR 3.551] vs. median EUR 7.468 [IQR EUR 4.074]; p < 0.0001) were higher for robotic-assisted surgery, resulting in reduced total inpatient profits (median EUR -3.196 [IQR EUR 9.101] vs. median EUR 232 [IQR EUR 6.304]; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In our study, robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer resulted in less severe and fewer total postoperative complications. Still, it was associated with higher surgery and inpatient costs. With increasing experience, the operative time may be reduced, and the postoperative recovery may be further accelerated, leading to reduced surgery and total inpatient costs.
Keywords: colorectal surgery; inpatient costs; laparoscopic surgery; rectal cancer; robotic-assisted surgery; surgery costs; total mesorectal excision.
Conflict of interest statement
J.C.L. received remuneration for travel, accommodation, and fees for robotic courses from Intuitive Surgical; otherwise, the authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 4;11(21):6561. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216561. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36362789 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 36087608 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):145-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000265. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015. PMID: 25489707
-
Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;15(3):839. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030839. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36765797 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1741-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3145-0. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 30187156
Cited by
-
Combined TaTME with SP Robot for Low Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer: rSPa TaTME.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1328. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081328. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40282504 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive model for sphincter preservation in lower rectal cancer.World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 24;16(8):107596. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.107596. World J Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40901315 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery: Faster Recovery and Less Pain Compared to Laparoscopy in a Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;17(2):243. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020243. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39858025 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted rectal resections: a multicenter real-world evidence study from Indian collaborative group on rectal resections (ICGRR).J Robot Surg. 2025 May 16;19(1):222. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02375-5. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40380031 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons to Learn From 36 Cases of Well-Leg Compartment Syndrome in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67886. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39328622 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer Cancer Fact Sheets—Rectum. [(accessed on 28 June 2023)]. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/9-Rectum-fact-sheet.pdf.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources