Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 13:6:1322012.
doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1322012. eCollection 2024.

Pigs lacking the SRCR5 domain of CD163 protein demonstrate heritable resistance to the PRRS virus and no changes in animal performance from birth to maturity

Affiliations

Pigs lacking the SRCR5 domain of CD163 protein demonstrate heritable resistance to the PRRS virus and no changes in animal performance from birth to maturity

Clint Nesbitt et al. Front Genome Ed. .

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the world's most persistent viral pig diseases, with a significant economic impact on the pig industry. PRRS affects pigs of all ages, causing late-term abortions and stillbirths in sows, respiratory disease in piglets, and increased susceptibility to secondary bacterial infection with a high mortality rate. PRRS disease is caused by a positive single-stranded RNA PRRS virus (PRRSV), which has a narrow host-cell tropism limited to monocyte-macrophage lineage cells. Several studies demonstrated that the removal of CD163 protein or, as a minimum, its scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain 5 (SRCR5) precludes the viral genome release, conferring resistance to PRRSV in live animals. Today, very limited information exists about the impact of such edits on animal performance from birth to maturity in pigs. Using CRISPR-Cas9 with dual-guide RNAs and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), first-generation (E0) pigs were produced with a deletion of exon 7 in the CD163 gene. The selected pigs were bred to produce the next three generations of pigs to establish multiple lines of pigs homozygous for the edited allele, thereby confirming that the CD163 gene with removed exon 7 was stable during multiple breeding cycles. The pigs were evaluated relative to non-edited pigs from birth to maturity, including any potential changes in meat composition and resistance to PRRSV. This study demonstrates that removing the SRCR5 domain from the CD163 protein confers resistance to PRRSV and, relative to unedited pigs, resulted in no detected differences in meat composition and no changes in the growth rate, health, and ability to farrow. Together, these results support the targeted use of gene editing in livestock animals to address significant diseases without adversely impacting the health and well-being of the animals or the food products derived from them.

Keywords: CRISPR; PRRS; disease resistance; gene editing; pigs; porcine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors CN, BB, SR, and ER were employed by Genus plc Research and Development. Authors LGP, C-YC, MC, PH, JH, AS, and MR were employed by Genus plc PIC.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Breeding approach to develop the multiple generations of edited pigs for evaluation of disease resistance, phenotypical characteristics, and meat composition and quality. Multiple edited E0 animals (CD163 ΔE7/+) from the same elite breeding line were crossed with unedited, wild-type animals (CD163 +/+) to produce the heterozygous (CD163 ΔE7/+) E1 generation. The segregating E2 population was created by interbreeding among E1 animals. Homozygous-edited (CD163 ΔE7/ΔE7) and null (CD163 +/+) animals in the E3 generation derived from crosses between homozygous-edited and null E2 animals, respectively.

References

    1. Boler D. (2019). Projecting changes in pig growth, pork quality, eating experience, and muscle physiology due to increasing live and carcass weights, NPB #17-090. Research Report, Animal Science. Pork Checkoff. National Pork Board.Available at: https://porkcheckoff.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/17-090-BOLER-final-r... .
    1. Bottacini M., Scollo A., Edwards S. A., Contiero B., Veloci M., Pace V., et al. (2018). Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): welfare indicators and ham defects. PLoS One 13 (11), e0207115. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burger B. T., Beaton B. P., Campbell M. A., Brett B. T., Rohrer M. S., Plummer S., et al. (2024). Commercial-scale generation of porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome 2 (PRRS) virus resistant pigs using CRISPR-Cas. CRISPR J. In press. 10.1089/crispr.2023.0061 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burkard C., Opriessnig T., Mileham A. J., Stadejek T., Ait-Ali T., Lillico S. G., et al. (2018). Pigs lacking the scavenger receptor cysteine rich domain 5 of CD163 are resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 infection. J. Virology 92 (16), e00415. 10.1128/jvi.00415-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calvert J. G., Slade D. E., Shields S. L., Jolie R., Mannan R. M., Ankenbauer R. G., et al. (2007). CD163 expression confers susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses. J. Virology 81 (14), 7371–7379. 10.1128/JVI.00513-07 - DOI - PMC - PubMed