Radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as local therapy for primary tumors in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer
- PMID: 38544836
- PMCID: PMC10965631
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368926
Radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as local therapy for primary tumors in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: Radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as local therapy for primary tumors in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 13;14:1427226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1427226. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38939340 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: We compared radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) as local therapies for primary tumors and examined their associations with survival outcomes and urinary tract complications in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC).
Methods: We evaluated the data of 85 patients diagnosed with omPC who underwent local therapy for primary tumors between January 2008 and December 2018. Of the 85 patients, 31 underwent prostate RT, while 54 underwent RP. Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of fewer than five metastatic lesions without visceral metastasis. Urinary tract complications, progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses.
Results: Patients treated with RT showed higher prostate-specific antigen levels. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (52.5% vs. 37.9%, p=0.351), CSS (67.6% vs. 84.7%, p=0.473), or OS (63.6% vs. 73.8%, p=0.897) between the RT and RP groups. In the multivariate analyses, the type of local therapy was not associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.334, p=0.356), CSS (HR=0.744, p=0.475), or OS (HR=0.953, p=0.897).
Conclusion: Therefore, RP seems to be a possible treatment option for patients with omPC, exhibiting oncologic outcomes comparable to those with RT.
Keywords: local therapy; oligometastasis; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2024 Ham, Park, Jang and Kim.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Oishi T, Hatakeyama S, Tabata R, Fujimori D, Fukuda M, Shinozaki T, et al. . Comparison of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy vs. extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:3436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30627-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources