Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 13:15:1309702.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1309702. eCollection 2024.

Incidence and risk factors for psychological distress in adult female patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lin Tao #  1 , Yuping Xiang #  2 , Xiaohong Zeng  1 , Lan Fu  1 , Junying Li  3 , Hong Chen  4
Affiliations
Review

Incidence and risk factors for psychological distress in adult female patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lin Tao et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer-related distress can be described as a complex and unpleasant combination of psychological (such as cognitive, behavioral, and emotional), social, and spiritual challenges that may impact an individual's ability to effectively cope with the physical symptoms of cancer and its treatment. Existing literature has confirmed psychological distress (PD) as an important sequela of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, the incidence and risk factors for PD in adult female patients with breast cancer remain unclear; therefore, focusing on the PD of female breast cancer patients is meaningful, as they are at highest risk of contracting breast cancer, and might differ in their coping styles from men.

Objective: This review aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for PD in adult woman patients with breast cancer, and to help guide targeted intervention to prevent distress.

Method: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAL, PsycINFO, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, the Chinese Biomedical Database, and Weipu Database were searched for data regarding the incidence and risk factors of PD in adult women with breast cancer.

Results: The prevalence of PD, assessed using the distress thermometer, ranged between 11.2%-86.7%, and a meta-analysis of 47 studies with 15,157 adult female breast cancer patients showed that the pooled prevalence was 52.0%. Further, this study identified 40 risk factors. However, owing to the inclusion of at least two studies for a certain risk factor, 10 risk factors were merged for the meta-analysis. Independent risk factors included higher education level, late-stage tumor, emotional concerns, no medical insurance, modified radical mastectomy, and history of depression; age and neuroticism were not associated with PD; and higher monthly income was revealed as a protective factor against it.

Conclusion: The incidence of PD in female patients with breast cancer is high and it involves 10 risk factors, though some are controversial owing to insufficient evidence. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms of PD and develop risk factor-based holistic intervention programs to reduce its incidence.

Systematic review registration: The protocol of this study has been registered in the database PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42023433578).

Keywords: breast cancer; incidence; psychological distress; review; risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of prevalence of psychological distress.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for the publication bias of included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nardin S, Mora E, Varughese FM, D’Avanzo F, Vachanaram AR, Rossi V, et al. . Breast cancer survivorship, quality of life, and late toxicities. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00864 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Licu M, Ionescu CG, Paun S. Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: The modern psycho-oncologic approach for romania-a review. Curr Oncol. (2023) 30(7):6964–75. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070504 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, et al. . Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: Aa meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol. (2011) 12:160–74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70002-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M, Blais MC, Howes J, Levy K, et al. . Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psychooncology. (2011) 20:463–9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1932 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources