Development and validation of a novel model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: an international, retrospective, multicentre analysis
- PMID: 38547894
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00076-7
Development and validation of a novel model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: an international, retrospective, multicentre analysis
Abstract
Background: The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with high-risk melanomas necessitates accurate staging of disease. However, inconsistencies in outcomes exist between disease stages as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition). We aimed to develop a tool to predict patient-specific outcomes in people with melanoma rather than grouping patients according to disease stage.
Methods: Patients older than 13 years with confirmed primary melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between Oct 29, 1997, and Nov 11, 2013, at four European melanoma centres (based in Berlin, Germany; Amsterdam and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Warsaw, Poland) were included in the development cohort. Potential predictors of recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival assessed were sex, age, presence of ulceration, primary tumour location, histological subtype, Breslow thickness, sentinel node status, number of sentinel nodes removed, maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis, and Dewar classification. A prognostic model and nomogram were developed to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival on a continuous scale in patients with stage pT1b or higher melanomas. This model was also calibrated to predict melanoma-specific survival. Model performance was assessed by discrimination (area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]) and calibration. External validation was done in a cohort of patients with primary melanomas who underwent SLNB between Jan 30, 1997, and Dec 12, 2013, at the Melanoma Institute Australia (Sydney, NSW, Australia).
Findings: The development cohort consisted of 4071 patients, of whom 2075 (51%) were female and 1996 (49%) were male. 889 (22%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3182 (78%) had sentinel node-negative disease. The validation cohort comprised 4822 patients, of whom 1965 (41%) were female and 2857 (59%) were male. 891 (18%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3931 (82%) had sentinel node-negative disease. Median follow-up was 4·8 years (IQR 2·3-7·8) in the development cohort and 5·0 years (2·2-8·9) in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 5-year recurrence-free survival was 73·5% (95% CI 72·0-75·1) and 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 86·5% (85·3-87·8). In the validation cohort, the corresponding estimates were 66·1% (64·6-67·7) and 83·3% (82·0-84·6), respectively. The final model contained six prognostic factors: sentinel node status, Breslow thickness, presence of ulceration, age at SLNB, primary tumour location, and maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis. In the development cohort, for the model's prediction of recurrence-free survival, the AUC was 0·80 (95% CI 0·78-0·81); for prediction of melanoma-specific survival, the AUC was 0·81 (0·79-0·84). External validation showed good calibration for both outcomes, with AUCs of 0·73 (0·71-0·75) and 0·76 (0·74-0·78), respectively.
Interpretation: Our prediction model and nomogram accurately predicted patient-specific risk probabilities for 5-year recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival. These tools could have important implications for clinical decision making when considering adjuvant treatments in patients with high-risk melanomas.
Funding: Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests RCS reports honoraria (paid to their institution) from Amgen. AAMvdV reports consultancy fees (paid to their institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Ipsen, Eisai, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. RPMS has received honoraria for advisory board participation from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Qbiotics, and speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. AHRV has received honoraria from Novartis. RAS has received fees for professional services from MetaOptima Technology, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Evaxion, Provectus, Qbiotics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NeraCare, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Myriad Genetics, and GlaxoSmithKline. GVL reports consultancy or advisory fees from Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal, Highlight Therapeutics, Innovent Biologics, Novartis, OncoSec, PHMR, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Qbiotics, and Regeneron. JFT has received honoraria for advisory board participation from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Provectus, and travel and conference support from GlaxoSmithKline, Provectus, and Novartis. PR reports research funding (paid to their institution) from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Pfizer, and has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board participation from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, Philogen, and Blueprint Medicines. UK has received consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, travel support from Merck Serono and Pfizer, and grants for educational activities from Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pierre-Fabre. ACJvA reports honoraria for consultancy and serving on advisory boards (all paid to their institution) from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Pfizer, Neracare, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Sanofi, Sirius Medical, and 4SC, and research grants (paid to their institution) from Amgen, Merck, and Pfizer. DvK has participated on the data and safety monitoring boards of the FAST CABG and Multivessel Talent trials. DJG has served on data and safety monitoring boards for Amgen and Novartis (funds paid to their institution). All other authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2737-2746. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14862-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38216800
-
Should Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Be Performed for All T1b Melanomas in the New 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System?J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Jan 17. J Am Coll Surg. 2019. PMID: 30660817
-
A nomogram to predict node positivity in patients with thin melanomas helps inform shared patient decision making.J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(7):1276-1283. doi: 10.1002/jso.25720. Epub 2019 Oct 10. J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31602665
-
Association of Complex Lymphatic Drainage in Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Outcomes: A Cohort Study and Literature Review.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 May 1;149(5):416-423. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0076. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 36892824 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigation of prognostic factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous malignant melanoma: Experience from a reference centre in Turkey.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.043. Epub 2024 Feb 2. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024. PMID: 38417393 Review.
Cited by
-
Preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers containing disulfiram-copper complex by electrospinning: a potential delivery system against melanoma.Daru. 2024 Dec;32(2):573-583. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00527-w. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Daru. 2024. PMID: 38963538 Free PMC article.
-
Individualized Prediction for Risk of Recurrence in Stage I/II Melanoma Patients With Negative Sentinel Lymph Node.Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(23):e70441. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70441. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39611693 Free PMC article.
-
Construction and validation of machine learning models for predicting lymph node metastasis in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a large population-based study.Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):706-716. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1672. Epub 2025 Feb 18. Transl Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 40104720 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Approaches for the Management of Skin Cancer: A Review of Current Progress in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis for Patients with Melanoma.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 19;17(4):707. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040707. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
External validation of a model to predict recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival for patients with melanoma after sentinel node biopsy.Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4):znaf037. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf037. Br J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40243383 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials