Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;57(4):495-500.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.124. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

Prevalence and natural course of incidental gastric subepithelial tumors

Affiliations

Prevalence and natural course of incidental gastric subepithelial tumors

Dae-Hyuk Heo et al. Clin Endosc. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background/aims: Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are often encountered during the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. We assessed the prevalence of gastric SETs and the risk factors for their progression.

Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 30,754 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening at our medical center between January 2013 and December 2016.

Results: Among the 30,754 patients examined, 599 (1.94%) had gastric SETs. The prevalence increased with age and was 9.56% in patients aged ≥70 years. In total, 262 patients underwent serial endoscopy for more than 6 months. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 61-74), and the number of females was 167 (63.7%). During a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR, 38-75), 22 patients (8.4%) showed significant changes in tumor size. An irregular border (odds ratio, 4.623; 95% confidence interval, 1.093-19.558; p=0.037) was a significant risk factor for progression. Seven patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resections. The pathologies of gastric SETs included leiomyomas (n=3), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n=2), and lipomas (n=2).

Conclusions: The prevalence of gastric SETs increases with age. Most gastric SETs do not progress during long-term endoscopic examinations, and the risk of an increase in size is low in asymptomatic small SETs without irregular borders.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Irregular border; Risk factors; Stomach; Subepithelial tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The prevalence of gastric subepithelial tumors.
None

References

    1. Cho JW, Korean ESD Study Group Current guidelines in the management of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:235–240. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim YJ, Son HJ, Lee JS, et al. Clinical course of subepithelial lesions detected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:439–444. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Lee HL, Ahn YW, et al. Prevalence of gastric subepithelial tumors in Korea: a single center experience. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015;66:274–276. - PubMed
    1. Goto O, Kaise M, Iwakiri K. Advancements in the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors. Gut Liver. 2022;16:321–330. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho J, Han J, Choi M, et al. Correlation between endoscopic resection outcomes and endosonographic findings in gastric tumors with muscularis propria origin. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29947. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources