Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;16(4):339-346.
doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13178. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

Feasibility of the pitch efficiency rating: A novel tool for systematic assessment of pitching mechanics in developing throwing athletes

Charles Kenyon  1   2   3 , Alex Beebe  4 , Kirk Easley  5 , Neeru Jayanthi  1   2 , Robert Bowers  1   2
Affiliations

Feasibility of the pitch efficiency rating: A novel tool for systematic assessment of pitching mechanics in developing throwing athletes

Charles Kenyon et al. PM R. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Injuries in younger baseball athletes continue to increase despite work characterizing risk factors. Three-dimensional (3D) motion capture may identify suboptimal pitching mechanics that predispose an athlete to injury, but 3D-motion analysis is often inaccessible. Thus, there is a gap between the current biomechanics literature and its practical application in young athletes. The current study aims to assess the reliability of the pitch efficiency rating (PER) as a systematic tool to evaluate throwing mechanics in developing baseball pitchers.

Objective: To determine the feasibility of application and reliability of a novel, scientifically informed tool (PER) for the assessment of pitching mechanics.

Design: Reliability study using Bland-Altman methods for assessing agreement between two raters.

Setting: Academic medical center through community outreach.

Participants: Pitching mechanics were assessed and rated with the PER for 40 athletes (26 high school, 14 Division III), average age 19.0 years old (range 15.3-23.7 years old).

Interventions: N/A.

Main outcome measures: Interrater and intrarater reliability as calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: For initial readings comparing interrater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2, the ICC was calculated at 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.86) for the second set of ratings. Regarding intrarater reliability across reads, ICC was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.43-0.79) for Rater 1, and 0.91 for Rater 2 (95% CI 0.85-0.95).

Conclusions: The present study introduces the PER as a potential tool for evaluating pitching mechanics. However, the intrarater reliability of the PER did not meet preestablished criteria in one of the two pilot raters. Further study is needed to continue to assess the reliability of the tool across diverse demographics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Zaremski JL, Zeppieri G, Tripp BL. Sport specialization and overuse injuries in adolescent throwing athletes: a narrative review. J Athl Train. 2019;54(10):1030‐1039. doi:10.4085/1062‐6050‐333‐18
    1. Christoffer DJ, Melugin HP, Cherny CE. A clinician's guide to analysis of the pitching motion. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(2):98‐104. doi:10.1007/s12178‐019‐09556‐4
    1. Pappas AM, Zawacki RM, Sullivan TJ. Biomechanics of baseball pitching: a preliminary report. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(4):216‐222. doi:10.1177/036354658501300402
    1. Calabrese GJ. Pitching mechanics, revisited. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(5):652‐660.
    1. Chalmers PN, Wimmer MA, Verma NN, et al. The relationship between pitching mechanics and injury: a review of current concepts. Sports Health. 2017;9(3):216‐221. doi:10.1177/1941738116686545

LinkOut - more resources