Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;16(1):23-33.
doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.005.

The role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer: an overview of current trends

The role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer: an overview of current trends

D Balafoutas et al. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The capabilities of minimally invasive surgery, either as conventional laparoscopy, or as robotic surgery, have increased to an extent that it enables complex operations in the field of gynaecological oncology.

Objective: To document the role of minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in cancer.

Materials and methods: A review of the literature that shaped international guidelines and clinical practice.

Main outcome measures: Current guidelines of major international scientific associations and trends in accepted clinical practice.

Results: In recent years, evidence on oncologic outcome has limited the role of minimally invasive techniques in cervical cancer, while the treatment of early endometrial cancer with laparoscopy and robotic surgery has become the international standard. In ovarian cancer, the role of minimally invasive surgery is still limited. Current evidence on perioperative morbidity underlines the necessity to implicate minimally invasive techniques whenever possible.

Conclusion: The optimal surgical route for the treatment of gynaecological cancer remains in many cases controversial. The role of minimally invasive surgery remains increasing in the course of time.

What is new?: This comprehensive review offers an entire perspective on the current role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lymphatic mapping and identification of a sentinel lymph node in the right hemipelvis of a patient with endometrial cancer utilizing the indocyanine green method and a near-infrared camera in the overlay mode.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abu-Rustum NR, Rhee EH, Chi DS, et al. Subcutaneous tumor implantation after laparoscopic procedures in women with malignant disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:480–487. - PubMed
    1. Amant F, Mirza MR, Koskas M, et al. Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143:37–50. - PubMed
    1. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:491–505. - PubMed
    1. Angioli R, Palaia I, Zullo MA, et al. Diagnostic open laparoscopy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:455–461. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, et al. Ovarian Cancer, Version 2. 2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:191–226. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources