Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 29:26:e48130.
doi: 10.2196/48130.

Medical Misinformation in Polish on the World Wide Web During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Infodemiology Study

Affiliations

Medical Misinformation in Polish on the World Wide Web During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Infodemiology Study

Małgorzata Chlabicz et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Although researchers extensively study the rapid generation and spread of misinformation about the novel coronavirus during the pandemic, numerous other health-related topics are contaminating the internet with misinformation that have not received as much attention.

Objective: This study aims to gauge the reach of the most popular medical content on the World Wide Web, extending beyond the confines of the pandemic. We conducted evaluations of subject matter and credibility for the years 2021 and 2022, following the principles of evidence-based medicine with assessments performed by experienced clinicians.

Methods: We used 274 keywords to conduct web page searches through the BuzzSumo Enterprise Application. These keywords were chosen based on medical topics derived from surveys administered to medical practitioners. The search parameters were confined to 2 distinct date ranges: (1) January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021; (2) January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Our searches were specifically limited to web pages in the Polish language and filtered by the specified date ranges. The analysis encompassed 161 web pages retrieved in 2021 and 105 retrieved in 2022. Each web page underwent scrutiny by a seasoned doctor to assess its credibility, aligning with evidence-based medicine standards. Furthermore, we gathered data on social media engagements associated with the web pages, considering platforms such as Facebook, Pinterest, Reddit, and Twitter.

Results: In 2022, the prevalence of unreliable information related to COVID-19 saw a noteworthy decline compared to 2021. Specifically, the percentage of noncredible web pages discussing COVID-19 and general vaccinations decreased from 57% (43/76) to 24% (6/25) and 42% (10/25) to 30% (3/10), respectively. However, during the same period, there was a considerable uptick in the dissemination of untrustworthy content on social media pertaining to other medical topics. The percentage of noncredible web pages covering cholesterol, statins, and cardiology rose from 11% (3/28) to 26% (9/35) and from 18% (5/28) to 26% (6/23), respectively.

Conclusions: Efforts undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic to curb the dissemination of misinformation seem to have yielded positive results. Nevertheless, our analysis suggests that these interventions need to be consistently implemented across both established and emerging medical subjects. It appears that as interest in the pandemic waned, other topics gained prominence, essentially "filling the vacuum" and necessitating ongoing measures to address misinformation across a broader spectrum of health-related subjects.

Keywords: EBM; credibility; credible; disinformation; evidence based medicine; fake news; false; health information; infodemic; infodemiology; information credibility; information quality; infoveillance; misinformation; online health information; online information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four subsequent stages of web search research. The figure includes a step description, the product of the step, and an example.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The figure contains a detailed description of the subsequent stages of the web search research, with the year 2021 as an example. Topic identification, query generation, web page retrieval, and the subsequent web page filtration are depicted.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The figure shows the differences in the prevalence and interactions on social media of non-credible, credible, and neutral web pages in the two periods: (1) January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021; (2) January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2022. The bars indicate the number of websites that exceeded the social media engagement threshold (top 10 web pages mostly interacted with per search query) in a given period related to a given medical topic. Pie charts show the number of interactions (shares, likes, comments) with non-credible, credible, and neutral web pages over a given period, on a given medical topic. The aggregated social media engagement data was retrieved using the BuzzSumo Enterprise Application.

References

    1. Kranzberg M. History of technology. Science. 1960 Apr 22;131(3408):1246–1247. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3408.1246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 02;41:433–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-... - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wierzbicki A. Web Content Credibility. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
    1. Baines D., Elliott R.J. Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: an urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic (Working Paper) University of Birmingham. 2020. [2024-01-01]. https://repec.cal.bham.ac.uk/pdf/20-06.pdf .
    1. Packer M. Are meta-analyses a form of medical fake news? Thoughts about how they should contribute to medical science and practice. Circulation. 2017 Nov 28;136(22):2097–2099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030209.CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030209 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types