Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 1;47(7):1104-1110.
doi: 10.2337/dci23-0040.

Point-of-Care HbA1c in Clinical Practice: Caveats and Considerations for Optimal Use

David B Sacks  1 , M Sue Kirkman  2 , Randie R Little  3
Affiliations
Review

Point-of-Care HbA1c in Clinical Practice: Caveats and Considerations for Optimal Use

David B Sacks et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) is widely used for the diagnosis and management of diabetes. Accurate measurement of A1C is necessary for optimal clinical value. Assay standardization has markedly improved the accuracy and consistency of A1C testing. Devices to measure A1C at point of care (POC) are commercially available, allowing rapid results when the patient is seen. In this review, we describe how standardization of A1C testing was achieved, leading to high-quality results in clinical laboratories. We address the use of POC A1C testing in clinical situations and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of POC A1C testing. We emphasize the importance of considering the limitations of these devices and following correct testing procedures to ensure that accurate A1C results are obtained for optimal care of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean for each method compared with the NGSP/DCCT target (dashed lines) in 1993, 1999, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2023 based on College of American Pathologists EC, GH2, and GH5 survey data. Symbols represent the mean of laboratory results for each method; error bars are ±2 SD. Results were reported as HbA1c (▪), HbA1 (♦), and total glycated hemoglobin (•). Data used with the permission of the College of American Pathologists.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Shapiro R, McManus MJ, Zalut C, Bunn HF. Sites of nonenzymatic glycosylation of human hemoglobin A. J Biol Chem 1980;255:3120–3127 - PubMed
    1. Sacks DB. A1C versus glucose testing: a comparison. Diabetes Care 2011;34:518–523 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al.; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986 - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–853 - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al.; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group . Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2643–2653 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances