Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 1;70(9):808-818.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

Affiliations

Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation

Hatem Ali et al. ASAIO J. .

Abstract

In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: T.F. is a current employee of the United States Veterans Health Administration. However, the views and opinions expressed herewith do not reflect the official views or opinions of and are not endorsed by the United States Veteran Health Administration. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haller M, Gutjahr G, Kramar R, Harnoncourt F, Oberbauer R: Cost-effectiveness analysis of renal replacement therapy in Austria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2988–2995, 2011.
    1. Ali H, Soliman K, Mohamed MM, et al.: Impact of kidney transplantation on functional status. Ann Med. 53: 1302–1308, 2021.
    1. Riley S, Zhang Q, Tse WY, Connor A, Wei Y: Using information available at the time of donor offer to predict kidney transplant survival outcomes: A systematic review of prediction models. Transpl Int. 35: 7, 1039.
    1. Kaboré R, Haller MC, Harambat J, Heinze G, Leffondré K: Risk prediction models for graft failure in kidney transplantation: A systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 32(suppl 2): ii68–ii76, 2017.
    1. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al.: A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 88: 231–236, 2009.