Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug 16;79(2):382-391.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae170.

Cardiac Adverse Events and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Safety Analysis of the Randomized DisCoVeRy Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cardiac Adverse Events and Remdesivir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Post Hoc Safety Analysis of the Randomized DisCoVeRy Trial

Vida Terzić et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases.

Methods: This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates.

Results: Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68).

Conclusions: Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23.

Keywords: COVID-19; antiviral therapy; cardiac adverse events; randomized controlled trials; remdesivir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. D. C. reports an human immunodeficiency virus grant from Janssen and lecture fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. F. M. reports grants and consulting fees from Pharmatheus, grants from Sanofi, and consulting fees from Ipsen, outside the submitted work. M. H. reports grants from the Belgian Center for Knowledge, the Fonds Erasme-COVID-Université Libre de Bruxelles, and the EU-Horizon programme, for the submitted work; support for attending meetings from Pfizer, MSD and Gilead, Pharmamar; support for participation on an advisory board for therapeutics on COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy trial); support for leadership for the Belgian guidelines on therapeutics for COVID-19; acting as president for the Belgian Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; and payment for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Gilead, GKS, INSMED, and Shionogi. J. P. reports lecture fees from Gilead and MSD; support for attending meetings from Gilead, Eumedica, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. C. B. reports participation on a DSMB for 4Living Biotech and consulting fees from Da Volterra and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. R. G. reports consulting fees from Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; lecture fees from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; support for attending meetings from Roche, Amgen, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Celgene, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Daiichi Sankvo; participation on a DSMB for Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; research grants from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; and stock or stock options from Novo Nordisk, Lilly. J.-A. P. reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals; lecture fees from Cepheid, Pfizer, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings from Pfizer and Gilead. C. A. reports lecture fees from Insmed, GSK, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi; grants or contracts from FEDER funding; support for attending meetings from Home perf; a leadership or fiduciary role as president of the Scientific Council of the French Respiratory Society; and serving as a member of the French ANRS-MIE for COVID and member of the COVID Group of the French Public Health High Council. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the safety analysis showing the distribution of the 1308 randomly assigned participants in the DisCoVeRy randomized, controlled trial per arm, first randomized in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio, then 1:1 for remdesivir and control groups once the other 3 arms were stopped for futility. In this safety analysis, 410 and 423 patients were included in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; EKG, electrocardiogram; SAE, serious adverse event.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates showing the times to cardiac adverse events from the modified intention-to-treat population in the remdesivir and control groups: overall cardiac adverse events (A), serious cardiac adverse events (B), any nonserious adverse cardiac events (C), and serious arrhythmic events (D). Blue lines show the remdesivir group. Orange lines show the control group. A number-at-risk table is provided for each plot by treatment group.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warren T, Jordan R, Lo MK, et al. . Therapeutic efficacy of the small molecule GS-5734 against Ebola virus in rhesus monkeys. Nature 2016; 531:381–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, et al. . Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2020; 395:1569–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, et al. . Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19—final report. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1813–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spinner CD, Gottlieb RL, Criner GJ, et al. . Effect of remdesivir vs. standard care on clinical status at 11 days in patients with moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 324:1048–457. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldman JD, Lye DC, Hui DS, et al. . Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1827–37. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms