The association of patient and disease characteristics with the overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016
- PMID: 38555410
- DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00822-2
The association of patient and disease characteristics with the overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016
Abstract
Background: Although active surveillance is the preferred management for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), some men remain at risk of overtreatment with definitive local therapy. We hypothesized that baseline characteristics may be associated with overtreatment and represent a potential source of health disparities. We therefore examined the associations of patient and disease characteristics with the surgical overtreatment of low-risk PCa.
Methods: We identified men aged 45-75 years with cT1 cN0 cM0 prostate adenocarcinoma with biopsy Gleason score 6 and PSA < 10 ng/ml from 2010-2016 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the associations of baseline characteristics with clinically insignificant PCa (iPCa) at RP (i.e., "overtreatment"), defined as organ-confined (i.e., pT2) Gleason 3 + 3 disease, using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: We identified 36,088 men with low-risk PCa who underwent RP. The unadjusted rate of iPCa decreased during the study period, from 54.7% in 2010 to 40.0% in 2016. In multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics, older age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.98), later year of diagnosis (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.67 for 2016 vs. 2010), Black race (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91), treatment at an academic/research program (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.91), higher PSA (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92), and higher number of positive biopsy cores (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.86-0.88) were independently associated with a lower risk of overtreatment (iPCa) at RP. Conversely, a greater number of biopsy cores sampled (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02) was independently associated with an increased risk of overtreatment (iPCa) at RP.
Conclusions: We observed an ~27% reduction in rates of overtreatment of men with low-risk PCa over the study period. Several patient, disease, and structural characteristics are associated with detection of iPCa at RP and can inform the management of men with low-risk PCa to reduce potential overtreatment.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC’s NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoC NCDB are the source of the de-identified data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.
Similar articles
-
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25736732
-
The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional Cohort.Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;7(4):838-843. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Dec 5. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38057193
-
Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.Prog Urol. 2019 Jan;29(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Prog Urol. 2019. PMID: 30337057
-
Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E120-E129. doi: 10.1111/bju.12771. Epub 2014 Aug 13. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24731026 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26497924
Cited by
-
Engaging for equity: Lessons from a cross-sector partnership addressing prostate cancer risk in the black community.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 10;11(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00743-x. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40495230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chen RC, Rumble RB, Loblaw DA, Finelli A, Ehdaie B, Cooperberg MR, et al. Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2182–90. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, Chen RC, Crispino T, Fontanarosa J, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options. J Urol. 2018;199:683–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71:618–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mohler JL. The 2010 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology on prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:145. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2010.0010 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mahal BA, Butler S, Franco I, Spratt DE, Rebbeck TR, D’Amico AV, et al. Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010-2015. JAMA. 2019;321:704–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19941 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous