Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar 30;19(1):162.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02654-6.

Double lung transplantation is better than single lung transplantation for end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Double lung transplantation is better than single lung transplantation for end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis

Yu-Chi Fang et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Lung transplantation is one of the most common treatment options for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the choice between single and double lung transplantation for these patients remains a matter of debate. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of medical databases for studies on single lung transplantation, double lung transplantation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Methods: The rate ratio and hazard ratio of survival were analyzed. The meta-analysis included 15 case-control and retrospective registry studies.

Results: The rate ratios of the 3-year survival (0.937 and P = 0.041) and 5-year survival (0.775 and P = 0.000) were lower for single lung transplantation than for double lung transplantation. However, the hazard ratio did not differ significantly between the two.

Conclusions: Double lung transplantation was found to provide better benefits than single lung transplantation in terms of the long-term survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Keywords: Chronic obstructive; Lung transplantation; Meta-analysis; Proportional hazards models; Pulmonary disease; Registries; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Rate ratio analysis of 1-year survival following double and single lung transplantation. CI, confidence interval; DLT, double lung transplantation; SLT, single lung transplantation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Rate ratio analysis of 3-year survival following double and single lung transplantation. CI, confidence interval; DLT, double lung transplantation; SLT, single lung transplantation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Rate ratio analysis of 5-year survival following double and single lung transplantation. CI, confidence interval; DLT, double lung transplantation; SLT, single lung transplantation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hazard ratio analysis of double and single lung transplantation. a Without propensity score matching in the study by Thabut et al. b With propensity score matching. CI, confidence interval; DLT, double lung transplantation; SLT, single lung transplantation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plot of all studies that included 1-year survival data
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Funnel plot of all studies that included 3-year survival data
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Funnel plot of all studies that included 5-year survival data
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Funnel plot of all studies included in the hazard ratio analysis. a Without propensity score matching in the study by Thabut et al. b With propensity score matching

References

    1. Pochettino A, Kotloff RM, Rosengard BR, Arcasoy SM, Blumenthal NP, Kaiser LR, et al. Bilateral versus single lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(6):1813–8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01970-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thabut G, Christie JD, Ravaud P, Castier Y, Brugière O, Fournier M, et al. Survival after bilateral versus single lung transplantation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective analysis of registry data. Lancet (London, England) 2008;371(9614):744–751. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60344-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moffatt SD, Demers P, Robbins RC, Doyle R, Wienacker A, Henig N, et al. Lung transplantation: a decade of experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.10.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thacker J, Toyoda Y. Lung and heart-lung transplantation at University of Pittsburgh: 1982–2009. Clinical transplants. 2009:179–95. - PubMed
    1. Jesel L, Barraud J, Lim HS, Marzak H, Messas N, Hirschi S, et al. Early and late atrial arrhythmias after lung transplantation- incidence, predictive factors and impact on mortality. Circ J. 2017;81(5):660–667. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0892. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms