Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
- PMID: 38556810
- DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16545
Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
Abstract
Background and aim: Perforation is one of the most important complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Several studies have examined risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforations, but most were retrospective analyses with small numbers of patients.
Methods: This study represents a secondary analysis of a Japanese multicenter prospective cohort study. We investigated the factors associated with each type of perforation using 9015 patients with 9975 EGCs undergoing ESD between July 2010 and June 2012.
Results: Intraoperative perforation occurred in 198 patients (2.2%) with 203 lesions (2.0%), necessitating emergency surgery for four lesions (0.04% [2.0%, 4/203]). Delayed perforation occurred in another 37 patients (0.4%) with 42 lesions (0.4%), requiring emergency surgery for 12 lesions (0.12% [28.6%, 12/42]). Factors showing significant independent correlations with intraoperative perforation were upper or middle third of the stomach; remnant stomach or gastric tube; procedure time ≥100 min; tumor size >35 mm; body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2; and ≥72 years. Factors showing significant independent correlations with delayed perforation were procedure time ≥60 min; BMI < 18.5 kg/m2; ≥75 years; ulceration; and tumor size >20 mm. Intraoperative perforation occurred most frequently at the greater curvature in the upper third of the stomach (7.9%), whereas delayed perforation occurred most frequently at the greater curvature in the middle third (1.2%).
Conclusion: This multicenter prospective cohort study clarified the risk and risk factors of intraoperative and delayed perforation related to ESD for EGCs, providing information to help endoscopists reduce perforation.
Keywords: endoscopic submucosal dissection; prospective study; stomach neoplasm.
© 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
- Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig. Endosc. 2016; 28: 3–15.
-
- Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series. Dig. Endosc. 2005; 17: 54–58.
-
- Suzuki H, Oda I, Sekiguchi M et al. Management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 21: 12635–12643.
-
- Yamamoto Y, Nishisaki H, Sakai H et al. Clinical factors of delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2017; 2017: 7404613.
-
- Imagawa A, Okada H, Kawahara Y et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 987–990.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
