Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;70(4):305-312.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002106. Epub 2023 Dec 21.

Neurologic Statistical Prognostication and Risk Assessment for Kids on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Neuro SPARK

Affiliations

Neurologic Statistical Prognostication and Risk Assessment for Kids on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Neuro SPARK

Neel Shah et al. ASAIO J. .

Abstract

This study presents Neuro-SPARK, the first scoring system developed to assess the risk of neurologic injury in pediatric and neonatal patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Using the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) registry, we applied robust machine learning methodologies and clinical expertise to a 10 years dataset. We produced separate models for veno-venous (V-V ECMO) and veno-arterial (V-A ECMO) configurations due to their different risk factors and prevalence of neurologic injury. Our models identified 14 predictor variables for V-V ECMO and 20 for V-A ECMO, which demonstrated moderate accuracy in predicting neurologic injury as defined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) (V-V = 0.63, V-A = 0.64) and good calibration as measured by the Brier score (V-V = 0.1, V-A = 0.15). Furthermore, our post-hoc analysis identified high- and low-risk groups that may aid clinicians in targeted neuromonitoring and guide future research on ECMO-associated neurologic injury. Despite the inherent limitations, Neuro-SPARK lays the foundation for a risk-assessment tool for neurologic injury in ECMO patients, with potential implications for improved patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prevalence of neurological injury by risk group for V-V patients within Neuro SPARK validation cohort. The dotted line represents the baseline rate of neurologic injury in these cohorts.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Prevalence of neurological injury by risk group for V-A patients within Neuro SPARK validation cohort. The dotted line represents the baseline rate of neurologic injury in these cohorts.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barreto JA, Mehta A, Thiagarajan RR, Hayward KN, Brogan A, Brogan TV: The Use of Extracorporeal Life Support in Children With Immune-Mediated Diseases. Pediatr Crit Care Med 23 (1): e60–e65, 2022. doi: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farhat A, Li X, Huet B, Tweed J, Morriss MC, Raman L: Routine Neuroimaging: Understanding Brain Injury in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Crit Care Med 50 (3): 480–490, 2022. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005308. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polito A, Barrett CS, Wypij D, et al.: Neurologic complications in neonates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. An analysis of ELSO registry data. Intensive Care Med 39 (9): 1594–601, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2985-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle K, Felling R, Yiu A, et al.: Neurologic Outcomes After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 19 (8): 760–766, 2018. doi: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Said AS, Guilliams KP, Bembea MM: Neurological Monitoring and Complications of Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. Pediatr Neurol 108: 31–39, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.03.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources