Effect of floating treatment wetland coverage ratio and operating parameters on nitrogen removal: toward design optimization
- PMID: 38557712
- DOI: 10.2166/wst.2024.064
Effect of floating treatment wetland coverage ratio and operating parameters on nitrogen removal: toward design optimization
Abstract
Floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) have the potential to improve the quality of wastewater discharges, yet design basics are unavailable to size these systems. This study investigates the effect of FTWs' coverage ratio and hydraulic retention time on agri-food wastewater treatment. This was studied in a pilot-scale experiment comprising four lagoons (6.5 m3 each) fed with real effluent from an existing tertiary treatment lagoon. An evaluation of FTW of different sizes (L24, L48, and L72 representing 24, 48, and 72% of pilot lagoons surface areas) and a control, L0 (without FTW), was performed over 16 months. Overall, L72 and L48 moderately improved total nitrogen (TN) mass removal compared to L0 (p < 0.05), while L24 exhibited similar TN mass removal (p = 0.196). The highest improvement was observed for L72, exhibiting up to 55% (mean of 13%) greater N mass removal than the control. The net increase in TN removal by FTWs was mainly related to denitrification, promoted by decreasing dissolved oxygen for increasing FTW coverage ratio. Residence time, temperature, and dissolved oxygen were the main parameters driving TN removal by FTWs. Retrofitting existing lagoons with FTW can facilitate N retrieval through plant harvesting, thereby reducing N remobilization from sediment (common in conventional lagoons).
Keywords: FTW coverage ratio; design optimization; plant assimilation; wastewater treatment.
© 2024 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there is no conflict.
References
-
- Abi Hanna R., Borne K. E., Gerente C. & & Andres Y. 2023 Recycled cellular concrete aggregates to improve phosphorous removal in floating treatment wetland: A pilot experiment for meat-processing factory's wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering 53, 103766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103766.
-
- Ahou Y. S., Bautista Angeli J.-R., Awad S., Baba-Moussa L. & Andres Y. 2021 Lab-scale anaerobic digestion of cassava peels : The first step of energy recovery from cassava waste and water hyacinth. Environmental Technology 42 (9), 1438–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1670266. - PubMed
-
- APHA, AWWA, WEF 2012 Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
-
- Barco, A. & Borin, M. 2017 Treatment performance and macrophytes growth in a restored hybrid constructed wetland for municipal wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering 107, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.004.
-
- Barco A., Bona S. & Borin M. 2021 Plant species for floating treatment wetlands: A decade of experiments in North Italy. Science of the Total Environment 751, 141666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141666. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
