Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jun 13;143(24):2464-2473.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021620.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel vs standard of care in second-line large B-cell lymphoma: outcomes by metabolic tumor volume

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Axicabtagene ciloleucel vs standard of care in second-line large B-cell lymphoma: outcomes by metabolic tumor volume

Frederick L Locke et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) assessed using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography, a measure of tumor burden, is a promising prognostic indicator in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). This exploratory analysis evaluated relationships between baseline MTV (categorized as low [median or less] vs high [greater than median]) and clinical outcomes in the phase 3 ZUMA-7 study (NCT03391466). Patients with LBCL relapsed within 12 months of or refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) or standard care (2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients who had a response). All P values are descriptive. Within high- and low-MTV subgroups, event-free survival (EFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were superior with axi-cel vs standard care. EFS in patients with high MTV (vs low MTV) was numerically shorter with axi-cel and was significantly shorter with standard care. PFS was shorter in patients with high MTV vs low MTV in both the axi-cel and standard-care arms, and median MTV was lower in patients in ongoing response at data cutoff vs others. Median MTV was higher in patients treated with axi-cel who experienced grade ≥3 neurologic events or cytokine release syndrome (CRS) than in patients with grade 1/2 or no neurologic events or CRS, respectively. Baseline MTV less than or equal to median was associated with better clinical outcomes in patients receiving axi-cel or standard care for second-line LBCL. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03391466.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: F.L.L. reports consulting/advisory role for Allogene, Amgen, bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Calibr, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Cowen, EcoR1 Capital, Emerging Therapy Solutions Gerson Lehman Group, GammaDelta Therapeutics, Iovance, Janssen, Kite, Legend Biotech, Novartis, Umoja Biopharma, and Wugen; research funding from Allogene, Kite, and Novartis; and patents, royalties, and other intellectual property from several patents held by the institution in their name (unlicensed) in the field of cellular immunotherapy. O.O.O. reports research funding from Kite; and consulting/advisory role for Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Curio Science, ADC Therapeutics, and TG Therapeutics. J.K. reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Seagen; consulting/advisory role for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Karyopharm, Merck, Roche, and Seagen; and research funding from Roche and Janssen. C. Thieblemont reports honoraria from and consulting/advisory role for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, Kite, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Kite, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. F.M. reports consulting/advisory role for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Epizyme, Genmab, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche; speakers’ bureau participation for Roche; and expert testimony for Roche and Genentech. G.S. reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Epizyme, Regeneron, Roche, MorphoSys, Kite, and Novartis; consultancy/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Kite, Loxo, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Rapt; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Debiopharm, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Incyte, Kite, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Takeda, and VelosBio. S.P.R. reports employment with, stock, or other ownership in and patents, royalties, other intellectual property from Precision Molecular and PlenaryAI; honoraria from, speakers’ bureau participation for, and travel support from Lantheus Pharmaceuticals; and consultancy/advisory role for and research funding from Precision Molecular, Lantheus Pharmaceuticals, and PlenaryAI. S.V. reports employment with and research funding from Kite; and stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences. J.W. reports employment with and research funding from Kite; and stock or other ownership in Gilead. S.F. reports employment and stock or ownership with Kite; and patents, royalties, and other intellectual property from Tusk Therapeutics. C. To reports employment with Kite; and stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences. P.C. reports employment with Kite; stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences; and travel support from Kite. M.S. reports employment with, honoraria from, travel support from, and other relationships with Kite; and stock or other ownership in Gilead Sciences. R.K. reports employment with Imaging Endpoints; stock or other ownership in Teladoc, Teleview, Globavir, Verve, and Renibus; consulting or advisory role for Dynamicure, Fore Biotherapeutics, SonALAsense, Dracen, Day One, and FibroGen; and patents, royalties, and other intellectual property with Imaging Endpoints. M.J.K. reports honoraria from and consulting/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Kite, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, and Roche; research funding from Kite, Roche, Takeda, and Celgene; and travel support from Kite, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, and Roche.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Baseline MTV estimates from whole-body FDG PET images. Single-slice coronal FDG PET images (A,E) demonstrating hypermetabolic uptake in the original image data sets. (A-D) Hypermetabolic FDG uptake in a limited number of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis with an estimated total whole-body MTV of 231.9 mL. (E-H) Hypermetabolic FDG uptake in soft-tissue and nodal lesions in the chest and abdomen with an estimated total whole-body MTV of 1921.7 mL. The segmented lesions containing the individual lesion masks (colored regions in panels B,F) are shown. Within each of these segmented lesions, masks of the FDG PET voxels with SUV values 41% to 100% of SUVmax are delineated on the parametric maps (C,G). The total whole-body MTV is then calculated from the sum of delineated voxels. The arrows represent normal physiologic activity in the bladder (A,E) and gastrointestinal tract (A). Panels D,H are maximum intensity projection images that represent the extent of disease on the whole-body FDG PET.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Associations between baseline MTV and known prognostic factors. Spearman correlation estimates and P values from a Fisher z transformation were used to summarize relationships between baseline MTV and continuous baseline covariates. (A) Baseline SPD vs MTV. (B) Baseline LDH vs MTV. The fit line is based on linear regression with 95% CI limit.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier plots of survival outcomes by MTV and treatment arm. (A) EFS per central assessment. (B) PFS per investigator assessment. Estimated HRs, 95% CIs, and descriptive 2-sided P values were calculated from a Cox proportional-hazards model.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Baseline MTV by response group and treatment arm. (A) Responders vs nonresponders per central assessment. (B) Patients with ongoing response vs others per central assessment. Descriptive 2-sided P values for 2-group comparisons were calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Extreme values are not shown.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Baseline MTV by grade of neurologic events and CRS in patients treated with axi-cel. (A) Neurologic events. (B) CRS. Descriptive 2-sided P values for 2-group comparisons were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Extreme values are not shown.

Comment in

  • Tumor burden in ZUMA-7: less is more.
    Darnell EP, Maus MV. Darnell EP, et al. Blood. 2024 Jun 13;143(24):2441-2442. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024592. Blood. 2024. PMID: 38869918 No abstract available.

References

    1. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):235–242. - PubMed
    1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1540–1545. - PubMed
    1. Nastoupil LJ, Bartlett NL. Navigating the evolving treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(4):903–913. - PubMed
    1. Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10343):2294–2308. - PubMed
    1. Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(7):640–654. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data