The influence of sentence focus on mental simulation: A possible cause of ACE instability
- PMID: 38558172
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01549-0
The influence of sentence focus on mental simulation: A possible cause of ACE instability
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed the instability of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). The current study was designed to demonstrate the hypothesis that the instability of the ACE may be attributed to the instability of focused information in a sentence. A pilot study indicated that the focused information of sentences was relatively stable in the sentence-picture verification task but exhibited significant interindividual variability in the action-sentence compatibility paradigm in previous studies. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of sentence focus on the shape match effect and the ACE by manipulating the focused information of sentences using the focus marker word "" (is). Experiment 1 found that the shape match effect occurred in the original sentence, while it disappeared when the word "" (is) was used to make an object noun no longer the focus of a sentence. Experiment 2 failed to observe the ACE regardless of whether the sentence focus was on the action information. Experiment 3 modified the focus manipulation to observe its impact on the ACE using different fonts and underlines to highlight the focused information. The results indicated that the ACE only occurred when the action information was the sentence focus. These findings suggest that sentence focus influences mental simulation, and the instability of the ACE is likely to be associated with the instability of sentence focus in previous studies. This outcome highlights the crucial role of identifying specific information as the critical element expressed in the current linguistic context for successful simulation.
Keywords: Action–sentence compatibility effect; Embodied cognition; Mental simulation; Sentence focus; Shape match effect.
© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Are visual processes causally involved in "perceptual simulation" effects in the sentence-picture verification task?Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Cognition. 2019. PMID: 30219635
-
Mental simulation of colour properties during language comprehension: influence of context and comprehension stages.Cogn Process. 2024 Nov;25(4):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01201-4. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Cogn Process. 2024. PMID: 38850444 Free PMC article.
-
How are mental simulations updated across sentences?Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1201-1214. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00928-2. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30963424 Free PMC article.
-
Incremental Sentence Processing in Japanese: A Maze Investigation into Scrambled and Control Sentences.J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Jun;45(3):475-505. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9356-4. J Psycholinguist Res. 2016. PMID: 25794495
-
The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE): Meta-analysis of a benchmark finding for embodiment.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103712. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103712. Epub 2022 Sep 11. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022. PMID: 36103797 Review.
Cited by
-
Issues in Grounded Cognition and How to Solve Them - the Minimalist Account.J Cogn. 2025 Apr 21;8(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.444. eCollection 2025. J Cogn. 2025. PMID: 40290452 Free PMC article.
-
The action-sentence compatibility effect in third person action sentence comprehension.Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1562351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562351. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40535184 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99532147 - DOI
-
- Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013 - DOI
-
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Birch, S., & Rayner, K. (1997). Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211306 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous