Capillary refill time response to a fluid challenge or a vasopressor test: an observational, proof-of-concept study
- PMID: 38558268
- PMCID: PMC10984906
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01275-5
Capillary refill time response to a fluid challenge or a vasopressor test: an observational, proof-of-concept study
Abstract
Background: Several studies have validated capillary refill time (CRT) as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion, and recent guidelines recommend CRT monitoring during septic shock resuscitation. Therefore, it is relevant to further explore its kinetics of response to short-term hemodynamic interventions with fluids or vasopressors. A couple of previous studies explored the impact of a fluid bolus on CRT, but little is known about the impact of norepinephrine on CRT when aiming at a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) target in septic shock. We designed this observational study to further evaluate the effect of a fluid challenge (FC) and a vasopressor test (VPT) on CRT in septic shock patients with abnormal CRT after initial resuscitation. Our purpose was to determine the effects of a FC in fluid-responsive patients, and of a VPT aimed at a higher MAP target in chronically hypertensive fluid-unresponsive patients on the direction and magnitude of CRT response.
Methods: Thirty-four septic shock patients were included. Fluid responsiveness was assessed at baseline, and a FC (500 ml/30 mins) was administered in 9 fluid-responsive patients. A VPT was performed in 25 patients by increasing norepinephrine dose to reach a MAP to 80-85 mmHg for 30 min. Patients shared a multimodal perfusion and hemodynamic monitoring protocol with assessments at at least two time-points (baseline, and at the end of interventions).
Results: CRT decreased significantly with both tests (from 5 [3.5-7.6] to 4 [2.4-5.1] sec, p = 0.008 after the FC; and from 4.0 [3.3-5.6] to 3 [2.6 -5] sec, p = 0.03 after the VPT. A CRT-response was observed in 7/9 patients after the FC, and in 14/25 pts after the VPT, but CRT deteriorated in 4 patients on this latter group, all of them receiving a concomitant low-dose vasopressin.
Conclusions: Our findings support that fluid boluses may improve CRT or produce neutral effects in fluid-responsive septic shock patients with persistent hypoperfusion. Conversely, raising NE doses to target a higher MAP in previously hypertensive patients elicits a more heterogeneous response, improving CRT in the majority, but deteriorating skin perfusion in some patients, a fact that deserves further research.
Keywords: Capillary refill time; Fluid challenge; Perfusion.; Septic shock; Vasopressor test.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Hernández G, Kattan E, Ospina-Tascón G, Bakker J, Castro R. Capillary refill time status could identify different clinical phenotypes among septic shock patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria: a post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2020;46:816–8. 10.1007/s00134-020-05960-4. - PubMed
-
- Kattan E, Hernández G, Tascón GO, Valenzuela ED, Bakker J. A lactate targeted resuscitation strategy may be associated with higher mortality in patients with septic shock and normal capillary refill time : a post hoc analysis of the ANDROMEDA SHOCK study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:114. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00732-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Contreras R, Hernández G, Valenzuela ED, González C, Ulloa R, Soto D et al. Exploring the relationship between capillary refill time, skin blood flow and microcirculatory reactivity during early resuscitation of patients with septic shock: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput [Internet]. 2022; 10.1007/s10877-022-00946-7. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
