Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28;16(2):e55136.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.55136. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Outcomes of Distal Third Femur Fractures in Patients 18 Years and Older: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Outcomes of Distal Third Femur Fractures in Patients 18 Years and Older: A Pilot Study

Gregory R Roytman et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: The selection of the most optimal fixation method for fractures of the distal femur, whether intramedullary nail (NL), lateral locking plate (PL), or nail/plate (NP) is not always clear. This study retrospectively evaluates surgical patients with distal femur fractures and introduces a pilot study using cluster analysis to identify the most optimal fracture fixation method for a given fracture type.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years and older with an isolated distal femur fracture who presented to our Level-1 trauma center between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022, and obtained NL, PL, or NP implants. Patients with polytrauma and those without at least six months of follow-up were excluded. A chart review was used to obtain demographics, fracture classification, fixation method, and postoperative complications. A cluster analysis was performed. The following factors were used to determine a successful outcome: ambulatory status pre-injury and 6-12 months postoperatively, infection, non-union, mortality, and implant failure.

Results: A total of 169 patients met inclusion criteria. No statistically significant association between the fracture classification and fixation type with overall outcome was found. However, patients treated with an NP (n = 14) had a success rate of 92.9% vs only a 68.1% success rate in those treated with a PL (n = 116) (p = 0.106). The most notable findings in the cluster analysis (15 total clusters) included transverse extraarticular fractures demonstrating 100% success if treated with NP (n = 6), 50% success with NL (n=2), and 78.57% success with PL fixation (n=14). NP constructs in complete articular fractures demonstrated success in 100% of patients (n = 5), whereas 77.78% of patients treated with NL (n = 9) and 61.36% of those treated with PL (n = 44).

Conclusions: Plate fixation was the predominant fixation method used for distal third femur fractures regardless of fracture classification. However, NP constructs trended towards improved success rates, especially in complete intraarticular and transverse extraarticular fractures, suggesting the potential benefit of additional fixation with these fractures. Cluster analysis provided a heuristic way of creating patient profiles in patients with distal third femur fractures. However, a larger cohort study is needed to corroborate these findings to ultimately develop a clinical decision-making tool that also accounts for patient specific characteristics.

Keywords: cluster analysis; demography; distal femur fractures; dual plate construct; lateral locking plate; outcome assessment; retrograde intramedullary femoral nail.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. AO Fracture Classification System for distal femur fractures. (Copyright by AO Foundation, Switzerland)
The image has a copyright by AO Foundation, Switzerland, and the authors have obtained permission to use this graphic.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Silhouette Analysis of distal femur fracture data to determine the number of clusters.

References

    1. The epidemiology of adult distal femoral shaft fractures in a central london major trauma centre over five years. Khan AM, Tang QO, Spicer D. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:1277–1291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005) Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:366–371. - PubMed
    1. Intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures in adults. Xiong R, Mai Q, Yang C, Ye S, Zhang X, Fan S. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018:0.
    1. Weight bearing as tolerated after intramedullary nailing of the femur: a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Deliberato D, Myers DM, Schnee B, et al. Orthopedics. 2022;45:0–53. - PubMed
    1. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures results in high union rate. Nino S, Parry JA, Avilucea FR, Haidukewych GJ, Langford JR. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32:1577–1582. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources