Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Mar 30:16:17588359241242406.
doi: 10.1177/17588359241242406. eCollection 2024.

Exceptional synergistic response of PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor in esophageal adenocarcinoma with a germline BRCA2 mutation: a case report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Exceptional synergistic response of PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor in esophageal adenocarcinoma with a germline BRCA2 mutation: a case report

Himil Mahadevia et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy in various tumors. A significant therapeutic challenge with either ICIs or PARP inhibitors as monotherapy is treatment failure from intrinsic primary resistance or the development of secondarily acquired resistance after a period of responsiveness. The combination of PARP inhibitors and ICIs could mitigate this by potentiating treatment response. We describe an 83-year-old male patient who initially presented with abdominal pain, and weight loss along with alternating constipation and diarrhea. Imaging and biopsy revealed metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma. Genomic testing revealed germline BRCA2 mutation. The patient initially underwent a few cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. However, due to intolerance to chemotherapy, the patient's case was discussed at a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board. He was switched to PARP inhibitor olaparib and ICI nivolumab. This combination led to a durable complete response. A combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) plus ICI may work in synergy through various mechanisms including enhanced neoantigen expression, release of immune-activating cytokines, and increased programmed death-ligand 1 expression. This may culminate in accentuated efficacy outcomes with a manageable safety profile. This exceptional response with ICI and PARPi in our case is consistent with the synergistic value of this combination, and prospective studies are warranted to definitively characterize clinical utility.

Keywords: BRCA; DNA repair; PARP; combination therapy; esophageal cancer; homologous recombination; immune checkpoint inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PET scans at diagnosis and 4 months after PARP inhibitor and ICI therapy. (a) Axial fused images from PET/CT prior to treatment show hypermetabolic primary mass at GEJ (left), hypermetabolic metastatic upper abdominal lymphadenopathy, and right hepatic lesion (right). (b) Axial fused images from PET/CT after eight cycles of treatment with nivolumab and olaparib show complete resolution of the primary GEJ mass (left) as well as the metastatic upper abdominal lymphadenopathy and right hepatic lesion (right). CT, computed tomography; GEJ, gastroesophageal junction; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; PET, positron emission tomography.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Timeline of events. The figure shows the timeline of events from diagnosis to last follow-up. ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin; MRD, minimal residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Prevalence of germline BRCA2 mutation (a) compared to the total number of cases in a particular type of cancer (b) compared to the total number of cases with germline BRCA2 mutations. CM, cutaneous melanoma; EC, esophageal carcinoma; IBC, invasive breast carcinoma; OV, ovarian carcinoma; PAC, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PRAD, prostate adenocarcinoma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al.. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 711–723. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, et al.. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 311–319. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al.. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–2092. - PubMed
    1. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al.. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398: 27–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun J-M, Shen L, Shah MA, et al.. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet 2021; 398: 759–771. - PubMed

Publication types