Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 4;17(6):275-280.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0443.

Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening from the National Health Interview Survey: Analysis of the Impact of Different Modalities on Overall Screening Rates

Affiliations

Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening from the National Health Interview Survey: Analysis of the Impact of Different Modalities on Overall Screening Rates

Derek W Ebner et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in adults in the United States. Despite compelling evidence of improved outcomes in colorectal cancer, screening rates are not optimal. This study aimed to characterize colorectal cancer screening trends over the last two decades and assess the impact of various screening modalities on overall colorectal cancer screening rates. Using National Health Interview Survey data from 2005 to 2021, we examined colorectal cancer screening [colonoscopy, multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal occult blood test (FOBT)/fecal immunochemical test, sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography] rates among adults ages 50-75 years (n = 85,571). A pseudo-time-series cross-sectional (pseudo-TSCS) analysis was conducted including a random effects generalized least squares regression model to estimate the relative impact of each modality on changes in colorectal cancer screening rates. Among 50 to 75 year olds, the estimated colorectal cancer screening rate increased from 47.7% in 2005 to 69.9% in 2021, with the largest increase between 2005 and 2010 (47.7%-60.7%). Rates subsequently plateaued until 2015 but increased from 63.5% in 2015 to 69.9% in 2018. This was primarily driven by the increased use of mt-sDNA (2.5% in 2018 to 6.6% in 2021). Pseudo-TSCS analysis results showed that mt-sDNA contributed substantially to the increase in overall screening rates (77.3%; P < 0.0001) between 2018 and 2021. While colorectal cancer screening rates increased from 2005 to 2021, they remain below the 80% goal. The introduction of mt-sDNA, a noninvasive screening test may have improved overall rates. Sustained efforts are required to further increase screening rates to improve patient outcomes and offering a range of screening options is likely to contribute to achieving this goal.

Prevention relevance: This retrospective study highlights the importance of convenient stool-based colorectal cancer screening options to achieve the national goal of 80% for overall colorectal cancer screening rates. Empowering screening-eligible individuals with a choice for their colorectal cancer screening tests is imperative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates—overall and by screening modality, 2005–2021. The lines on the chart represent colorectal cancer screening rates (overall and individual colorectal cancer screening modality) for individuals ages 50–75 years old identified in the NHIS data across study years (2005–2021).
Figure 1.
Trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates—overall and by screening modality, 2005–2021. The lines on the chart represent colorectal cancer screening rates (overall and individual colorectal cancer screening modality) for individuals ages 50–75 years old identified in the NHIS data across study years (2005–2021).
Figure 2. Attribution of each screening modality to the overall colorectal cancer screening rates from 2005 to 2021. The stack bars show percentages of individual colorectal cancer screening modality attributed toward the overall colorectal cancer screening during the study year.
Figure 2.
Attribution of each screening modality to the overall colorectal cancer screening rates from 2005 to 2021. The stack bars show percentages of individual colorectal cancer screening modality attributed toward the overall colorectal cancer screening during the study year.
Figure 3. Relative percent contribution to the overall colorectal cancer screening rate increase. The pie chart represents the contribution of each colorectal cancer screening modality to the increase of overall screening rate from 2018 to 2021 calculated using pseudo-TSCS and regression analyses.
Figure 3.
Relative percent contribution to the overall colorectal cancer screening rate increase. The pie chart represents the contribution of each colorectal cancer screening modality to the increase of overall screening rate from 2018 to 2021 calculated using pseudo-TSCS and regression analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Key statistics for colorectal cancer: how common is colorectal cancer? Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/colon-rectal-cancer/about/key-statis....
    1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023;73:233–54. - PubMed
    1. Cheng E, Blackburn HN, Ng K, Spiegelman D, Irwin ML, Ma X, et al. . Analysis of survival among adults with early-onset colorectal cancer in the national cancer database. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2112539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouwer NPM, Bos ACRK, Lemmens VEPP, Tanis PJ, Hugen N, Nagtegaal ID, et al. . An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2018;143:2758–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force; Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, et al. . Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325:1965–77. Erratum in: JAMA. 2021;326: 773. - PubMed

MeSH terms