Impact of nutritional support routes on mortality in acute pancreatitis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 38561603
- DOI: 10.1111/joim.13782
Impact of nutritional support routes on mortality in acute pancreatitis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Nutritional administration in acute pancreatitis (AP) management has sparked widespread discussion, yet contradictory mortality results across meta-analyses necessitate clarification. The optimal nutritional route in AP remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to compare mortality among nutritional administration routes in patients with AP using consistency model.
Methods: This study searched four major databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently extracted and checked data and quality. Network meta-analysis was conducted for estimating risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) based on random-effects model. Subgroup analyses accounted for AP severity and nutrition support initiation.
Results: A meticulous search yielded 1185 references, with 30 records meeting inclusion criteria from 27 RCTs (n = 1594). Pooled analyses showed the mortality risk reduction associated with nasogastric (NG) (RR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.16-0.73) and nasojejunal (NJ) feeding (RR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.25-0.84) in comparison to nil per os. Similarly, NG (RR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.24-0.83) and NJ (RR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.40-0.90) feeding also showed lower mortality risk than total parenteral nutrition. Subgroup analyses, stratified by severity, supported these findings. Notably, the timing of nutritional support initiation emerged as a significant factor, with NJ feeding demonstrating notable mortality reduction within 24 and 48 h, particularly in severe cases.
Conclusion: For severe AP, both NG and NJ feeding appear optimal, with variations in initiation timings. NG feeding does not appear to merit recommendation within the initial 24 h, whereas NJ feeding is advisable within the corresponding timeframe following admission. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing nutritional interventions in AP.
Keywords: acute pancreatitis; enteral feeding; nasogastric feeding; naso‐jejunal feeding; nutritional therapy; total parenteral nutrition.
© 2024 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.
References
-
- Pan LL, Li J, Shamoon M, Bhatia M, Sun J. Recent advances on nutrition in treatment of acute pancreatitis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:762.
-
- Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence‐based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:e1–e15.
-
- Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, Falck‐Ytter Y, Barkun AN. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1096–1101.
-
- Arvanitakis M, Ockenga J, Bezmarevic M, Gianotti L, Krznarić Ž, Lobo DN, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:612–631.
-
- Carlin‐Ronquillo A, Benites‐Goñi H, Diaz‐Arocutipa C, Alosilla Sandoval P, Piscoya‐Rivera A, Calixto L, et al. Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2023;43:207–216.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources