Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):404.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12174-0.

A radiomics signature derived from CT imaging to predict MSI status and immunotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer: a multi-cohort study

Affiliations

A radiomics signature derived from CT imaging to predict MSI status and immunotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer: a multi-cohort study

Peng-Chao Zhan et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Accurate microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is essential for identifying gastric cancer (GC) patients eligible for immunotherapy. We aimed to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics signature to predict MSI and immunotherapy outcomes in GC.

Methods: This retrospective multicohort study included a total of 457 GC patients from two independent medical centers in China and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) databases. The primary cohort (n = 201, center 1, 2017-2022), was used for signature development via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and logistic regression analysis. Two independent immunotherapy cohorts, one from center 1 (n = 184, 2018-2021) and another from center 2 (n = 43, 2020-2021), were utilized to assess the signature's association with immunotherapy response and survival. Diagnostic efficiency was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and survival outcomes were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method. The TCIA cohort (n = 29) was included to evaluate the immune infiltration landscape of the radiomics signature subgroups using both CT images and mRNA sequencing data.

Results: Nine radiomics features were identified for signature development, exhibiting excellent discriminative performance in both the training (AUC: 0.851, 95%CI: 0.782, 0.919) and validation cohorts (AUC: 0.816, 95%CI: 0.706, 0.926). The radscore, calculated using the signature, demonstrated strong predictive abilities for objective response in immunotherapy cohorts (AUC: 0.734, 95%CI: 0.662, 0.806; AUC: 0.724, 95%CI: 0.572, 0.877). Additionally, the radscore showed a significant association with PFS and OS, with GC patients with a low radscore experiencing a significant survival benefit from immunotherapy. Immune infiltration analysis revealed significantly higher levels of CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + B cells, and TNFRSF18 expression in the low radscore group, while the high radscore group exhibited higher levels of T cells regulatory and HHLA2 expression.

Conclusion: This study developed a robust radiomics signature with the potential to serve as a non-invasive biomarker for GC's MSI status and immunotherapy response, demonstrating notable links to post-immunotherapy PFS and OS. Additionally, distinct immune profiles were observed between low and high radscore groups, highlighting their potential clinical implications.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Immunotherapy; MSI; Radiomics signature; mRNA-seq.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flowchart for this study. MSI = microsatellite instability, GC = gastric cancer, PCR = polymerase chain reaction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiomics feature selection by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. (a) The selection of tuning parameter (λ) in the LASSO model used 10-fold cross-validation via minimum criteria. The AUC curve was plotted versus log (λ). (b) LASSO coefficient profiles of the radiomics features. A vertical line was plotted at the optimal λ value, which resulted in 9 features with nonzero coefficients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for different models in the training (a), and validation cohorts (b); Calibration curves for the radiomics signature in the training (c), and validation cohorts (d); Radscore of different subtypes in the training (e), and validation cohorts (f). MSI-H = microsatellite instability-high, MSS = microsatellite stable
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) illustrating the predictive performance of the radiomics signature for immunotherapy response in the ZZU (a) and SDU cohorts (b). Radscore distribution for different immunotherapy responses in the ZZU (c) and SDU cohorts (d). Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on distinct radscore groups in the immunotherapy cohorts: (e) PFS stratified by radscore groups in the ZZU cohort; (f) OS stratified by radscore groups in the ZZU cohort; (g) PFS stratified by radscore groups in the SDU cohort; (h) OS stratified by radscore groups in the SDU cohort. CR = complete response, PR = partial response, SD = stable disease, PD = progressive disease
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The heatmap of the clinical- and immune-related molecular landscape. From the top to the end, there are five categories, encompassing clinical characteristics, immune cells, B7-CD28, TNF superfamily, and other immune-related molecular landscapes
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Immune cell infiltration (a), proportion of microsatellite instability (MSI) status (b), expression status of TNFRSF18 (c) and expression status of HHLA2 (d) in different radscore groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan E, Arnold M, Camargo MC, Gini A, Kunzmann AT, Matsuda T, et al. The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020-40: a population-based modelling study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;47:101404. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101404. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thrift AP, El-Serag HB. Burden of gastric Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(3):534–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li K, Zhang A, Li X, Zhang H, Zhao L. Advances in clinical immunotherapy for gastric cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1876(2):188615. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Illerhaus G, Martens UM, Stoehlmacher J, et al. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Surgical Resection on Survival in patients with Limited Metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: the AIO-FLOT3 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(9):1237–44. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed