The effect of glycopyrrolate vs. atropine in combination with neostigmine on cardiovascular system for reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 38561654
- PMCID: PMC10983731
- DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02512-x
The effect of glycopyrrolate vs. atropine in combination with neostigmine on cardiovascular system for reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Glycopyrrolate-neostigmine (G/N) for reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) causes fewer changes in heart rate (HR) than atropine-neostigmine (A/N). This advantage may be especially beneficial for elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cardiovascular effects of G/N and A/N for the reversal of NMB in elderly patients.
Methods: Elderly patients aged 65-80 years who were scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the glycopyrrolate group (group G) or the atropine group (group A). Following the last administration of muscle relaxants for more than 30 min, group G received 4 ug/kg glycopyrrolate and 20 ug/kg neostigmine, while group A received 10 ug/kg atropine and 20 ug/kg neostigmine. HR, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and ST segment in lead II (ST-II) were measured 1 min before administration and 1-15 min after administration.
Results: HR was significantly lower in group G compared to group A at 2-8 min after administration (P < 0.05). MAP was significantly lower in group G compared to group A at 1-4 min after administration (P < 0.05). ST-II was significantly depressed in group A compared to group G at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 15 min after administration (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: In comparison to A/N, G/N for reversing residual NMB in the elderly has a more stable HR, MAP, and ST-II within 15 min after administration.
Keywords: Atropine; Cardiovascular system; Elderly; Glycopyrrolate; Neostigmine.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate and edrophonium-atropine.Anesth Analg. 2007 Mar;104(3):569-74. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000248224.42707.48. Anesth Analg. 2007. PMID: 17312210 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the combination of atropine and glycopyrrolate with atropine alone for the reversal of muscle relaxant.J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jul;97(7):705-9. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014. PMID: 25265768 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between glycopyrrolate and atropine in a mixture with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Studies in patients following open heart surgery.Br J Anaesth. 1985 Feb;57(2):184-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.2.184. Br J Anaesth. 1985. PMID: 2857570
-
Glycopyrrolate: It's time to review.J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:51-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Nov 18. J Clin Anesth. 2017. PMID: 28183573 Review.
-
Atrio-ventricular Block Following Neostigmine-Glycopyrrolate Reversal in Non-heart Transplant Patients: Case Report.Anesth Prog. 2018 Fall;65(3):187-191. doi: 10.2344/anpr-65-03-10. Anesth Prog. 2018. PMID: 30235426 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of neuromuscular blocking reversal agents on perioperative neurocognitive function after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03019-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40186115 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources